Cropping patterns choice and the implications on profitability and risk of the vegetable farming

Abstract This study examines the factors influencing farmers’ cropping pattern choices and evaluates how these patterns affect profitability and risk in vegetable farming within an upper watershed context. Data were collected from 277 vegetable-farming households across Bandung and West Bandung Regencies, covering 380 plots, or 579 plots–season combinations. A Multinomial Logit (MNL) model was chosen in this study for its ability to estimate how various explanatory variables influence the likelihood of selecting a specific cropping pattern (monoculture, polyculture, and mixed systems), in line with the study’s objective to identify key determinants of farmers’ crop diversification decisions. Complementary to this, a cost–benefit analysis assessed the economic performance of each pattern, while risk–profit mapping illustrated trade-offs across commodities. The findings reveal that monoculture dominated (50.8%), followed by polyculture (39.5%) and mixed systems (9.7%). Cropping decisions were significantly influenced by farmer characteristics (age, education), household labour availability, landholding size and status, plot slope, cropping intensity, risk exposure, and seasonal factors. Polyculture was associated with significantly higher net profits per hectare compared to monoculture. Commodities such as chilli, broccoli, and shallot offered high returns but also carried higher risk. Farmers adopted polyculture not only to manage risk but also to enhance income stability and cash flow. These results underscore the importance of aligning profitability and risk profiles to inform strategic cropping decisions. Policymakers are encouraged to support diversification through improved market access, targeted training for farmers and extension services, investing in water management infrastructure, and promoting access to risk management tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Food Economics
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-026-00494-7
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cropping patterns choice and the implications on profitability and risk of the vegetable farming

Mewa Ariani, Sudi Mardianto, Herlina Tarigan, Benny Rachman et al.
Agricultural and Food Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Cropping patterns choice and the implications on profitability and risk of the vegetable farming

Mewa Ariani, Sudi Mardianto, Herlina Tarigan, Benny Rachman, Mat Syukur, Ashari Ashari, Sumaryanto Sumaryanto, Tahlim Sudaryanto, Dadan Permana, Erwidodo Erwidodo, I Putu Eka Irawan, Sri Hery Susilowati, Adang Agustian, Muhammad Prama Yufdy, Sri Hastuti Suhartini
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the factors influencing farmers’ cropping pattern choices and evaluates how these patterns affect profitability and risk in vegetable farming within an upper watershed context. Data were collected from 277 vegetable-farming households across Bandung and West Bandung Regencies, covering 380 plots, or 579 plots–season combinations. A Multinomial Logit (MNL) model was chosen in this study for its ability to estimate how various explanatory variables influence the likelihood of selecting a specific cropping pattern (monoculture, polyculture, and mixed systems), in line with the study’s objective to identify key determinants of farmers’ crop diversification decisions. Complementary to this, a cost–benefit analysis assessed the economic performance of each pattern, while risk–profit mapping illustrated trade-offs across commodities. The findings reveal that monoculture dominated (50.8%), followed by polyculture (39.5%) and mixed systems (9.7%). Cropping decisions were significantly influenced by farmer characteristics (age, education), household labour availability, landholding size and status, plot slope, cropping intensity, risk exposure, and seasonal factors. Polyculture was associated with significantly higher net profits per hectare compared to monoculture. Commodities such as chilli, broccoli, and shallot offered high returns but also carried higher risk. Farmers adopted polyculture not only to manage risk but also to enhance income stability and cash flow. These results underscore the importance of aligning profitability and risk profiles to inform strategic cropping decisions. Policymakers are encouraged to support diversification through improved market access, targeted training for farmers and extension services, investing in water management infrastructure, and promoting access to risk management tools.

Agricultural and Food EconomicsVol. 14(1)
Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID)
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.