Seismic Performance of Ultra-High-Strength Concrete Beam–Column Connections with Openings Under Cyclic Loading

In modern multistory buildings, integrating beam web openings adjacent to beam–column connections (BCCs) is frequently required to accommodate utility ducts and piping. While this optimizes clear story height, it drastically alters the stress distribution within the BCCs under seismic loading. Consequently, this study evaluates the seismic performance of twenty-one exterior BCCs, with particular emphasis on the coupled effects of opening configuration (size and location) and concrete type: normal strength concrete (NSC, fc′ = 25 MPa), high-strength concrete (HSC, fc′ = 80 MPa), and ultra-high-strength concrete (UHPC, fc′ = 120 MPa). For BCC specimens without openings, upgrading from NSC to HSC and UHPC increased the failure load (Pf) by about 66.67% and 111.11%, and the ultimate capacity (Pu) by 61.54% and 100.0%, respectively. Conversely, web openings reduced the (Pu) of HSC specimens by 14–34%, and UHPC specimens by 12–31%, respectively, when compared to the reference specimens without openings. Furthermore, the presence of web openings compromised cumulative energy dissipation capacity by 16–36% for (NSC), 13–31% for (HSC), and 12–28% for (UHPC), compared with the corresponding reference specimens without openings. Although HSC and UHPC provided superior absolute energy performance, they did not eliminate the structural deficiencies associated with openings positioned adjacent to the joint core. Consequently, a critical threshold value of S/D ≥ 0.5 (where S represents the distance from the column face to the edge of the opening, and D denotes the beam depth), is recommended for HSC and UHPC. In contrast, conventional NSC strictly requires a more conservative limit of S/D ≥ 1.0 to prevent severe cyclic shear degradation near the high-stress region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16132509
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Performance of Ultra-High-Strength Concrete Beam–Column Connections with Openings Under Cyclic Loading

Dina Abdulaziz, Mahmoud A. El-Mandouh, Basem O. Rageh, Hassan Youssef et al.
Buildings
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Seismic Performance of Ultra-High-Strength Concrete Beam–Column Connections with Openings Under Cyclic Loading

Dina Abdulaziz, Mahmoud A. El-Mandouh, Basem O. Rageh, Hassan Youssef, Ahmed A. El-Barbary
article en

Abstract

In modern multistory buildings, integrating beam web openings adjacent to beam–column connections (BCCs) is frequently required to accommodate utility ducts and piping. While this optimizes clear story height, it drastically alters the stress distribution within the BCCs under seismic loading. Consequently, this study evaluates the seismic performance of twenty-one exterior BCCs, with particular emphasis on the coupled effects of opening configuration (size and location) and concrete type: normal strength concrete (NSC, fc′ = 25 MPa), high-strength concrete (HSC, fc′ = 80 MPa), and ultra-high-strength concrete (UHPC, fc′ = 120 MPa). For BCC specimens without openings, upgrading from NSC to HSC and UHPC increased the failure load (Pf) by about 66.67% and 111.11%, and the ultimate capacity (Pu) by 61.54% and 100.0%, respectively. Conversely, web openings reduced the (Pu) of HSC specimens by 14–34%, and UHPC specimens by 12–31%, respectively, when compared to the reference specimens without openings. Furthermore, the presence of web openings compromised cumulative energy dissipation capacity by 16–36% for (NSC), 13–31% for (HSC), and 12–28% for (UHPC), compared with the corresponding reference specimens without openings. Although HSC and UHPC provided superior absolute energy performance, they did not eliminate the structural deficiencies associated with openings positioned adjacent to the joint core. Consequently, a critical threshold value of S/D ≥ 0.5 (where S represents the distance from the column face to the edge of the opening, and D denotes the beam depth), is recommended for HSC and UHPC. In contrast, conventional NSC strictly requires a more conservative limit of S/D ≥ 1.0 to prevent severe cyclic shear degradation near the high-stress region.

BuildingsVol. 16(13)
Beni-Suef University (EG), Al Baha University (SA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.