Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on injection site complications among small ruminant animal health providers in Kumasi, Ghana

BACKGROUND: Injection-site complications are a poorly recognised problem in small ruminant production in Ghana. The improper injection can lead to tissue damage, abscesses, fibrosis, drug residues, lower meat quality and carcass condemnation, which can cause economic and public health issues. Veterinarians are legally qualified to give injections, but in practice, para-veterinarians and animal herders often do so, as they are in close contact with livestock and are often responsible for immediate animal care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of animal health providers on injection-site complications in Kumasi, Ghana. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out among 230 respondents including veterinarians (59), para-veterinarians (18), animal herders (143) and meat handlers (10) with a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used to collect and analyse data on knowledge, attitudes, anatomical injection-site preferences and injection practices. Retrospective abattoir records from January to August 2025 were also reviewed to determine the prevalence and distribution of injection-site lesions in slaughtered small ruminants. RESULTS: Occupation, age, gender, years of experience, and formal training were significantly associated with the level of knowledge (p < 0.05). Veterinarians had the highest awareness of injection-site complications and correct anatomical injection sites, whereas animal herders had lower awareness, especially about tissue necrosis, contamination-related infections, and improper drug absorption. The neck area was the most common site for intramuscular injection by veterinarians, while the thigh and gluteal muscles were the most common sites for para-veterinarians and animal herders. A total of 100 injection-site lesions were found in 43,483 slaughtered animals during abattoir inspection, with lesions mainly located in the thigh area. There was a significant association between formal training and positive attitudes with good injection practices (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in knowledge and practices about injection-site complications among animal health providers in Kumasi. Injection administration by para-veterinarians and herders, and inappropriate injection-site selection, may be factors in the lesions seen during meat inspection. Injection safety, meat quality and animal welfare can be enhanced through targeted training and inclusive veterinary extension programs that engage all livestock handlers.