A Tri-Axis Systematic Literature Review of AI-Powered Cyber Defense: ATT&CK-Aligned Analysis of Cyberattacks, Machine Learning Methods, and Datasets

The increasing complexity and sophistication of cyberattacks have made machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) central to modern cyber defense. However, existing surveys typically examine attacks, ML methods, or datasets separately, limiting understanding of how methodological choices align with adversarial behaviours and benchmark availability. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of AI- and ML-based cyber defense studies published between 2019 and 2025, framed as an ATT&CK-aligned tri-axis synthesis of cyberattacks, machine learning methods, and datasets. Across 99 primary studies, the review maps 312 attack labels to MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques, categorises the ML methods applied, and organizes 96 datasets into a refined taxonomy spanning NIDD, IoT-NIDD, malware, Spam and Phishing, ICS, Insider Threat, custom-collected, and other datasets. Rather than treating attacks, ML methods, and datasets as separate descriptive dimensions, the review analyses them jointly through a tri-axis cross-reference framework, enabling the identification of benchmark dependence, methodological concentration, and underexplored attack–method–dataset intersections that are not visible in single-axis or model-centred surveys. The synthesis shows that the literature is strongly concentrated on externally visible attacks associated with Impact, Initial Access, and Execution, that ensemble and deep learning models dominate high-frequency detection settings, and that dataset usage remains heavily skewed toward a small set of public benchmarks, particularly CSE-CIC-IDS2017, UNSW-NB15, and NSL-KDD. This review further identifies persistent blind spots, including limited coverage of post-compromise ATT&CK behaviours, sparse use of ICS and insider-threat datasets, and weak support for multi-stage or multi-dataset evaluation. These findings provide a more focused and actionable evidence base for future ML-based cyber defense research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132804
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tri-Axis Systematic Literature Review of AI-Powered Cyber Defense: ATT&CK-Aligned Analysis of Cyberattacks, Machine Learning Methods, and Datasets

Qublai Khan Ali Mirza, Hassan Chizari, Abu Alam, Mohammad Chizari
Electronics
Information and Cyber Security
article

A Tri-Axis Systematic Literature Review of AI-Powered Cyber Defense: ATT&CK-Aligned Analysis of Cyberattacks, Machine Learning Methods, and Datasets

Qublai Khan Ali Mirza, Hassan Chizari, Abu Alam, Mohammad Chizari
article en

Abstract

The increasing complexity and sophistication of cyberattacks have made machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) central to modern cyber defense. However, existing surveys typically examine attacks, ML methods, or datasets separately, limiting understanding of how methodological choices align with adversarial behaviours and benchmark availability. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of AI- and ML-based cyber defense studies published between 2019 and 2025, framed as an ATT&CK-aligned tri-axis synthesis of cyberattacks, machine learning methods, and datasets. Across 99 primary studies, the review maps 312 attack labels to MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques, categorises the ML methods applied, and organizes 96 datasets into a refined taxonomy spanning NIDD, IoT-NIDD, malware, Spam and Phishing, ICS, Insider Threat, custom-collected, and other datasets. Rather than treating attacks, ML methods, and datasets as separate descriptive dimensions, the review analyses them jointly through a tri-axis cross-reference framework, enabling the identification of benchmark dependence, methodological concentration, and underexplored attack–method–dataset intersections that are not visible in single-axis or model-centred surveys. The synthesis shows that the literature is strongly concentrated on externally visible attacks associated with Impact, Initial Access, and Execution, that ensemble and deep learning models dominate high-frequency detection settings, and that dataset usage remains heavily skewed toward a small set of public benchmarks, particularly CSE-CIC-IDS2017, UNSW-NB15, and NSL-KDD. This review further identifies persistent blind spots, including limited coverage of post-compromise ATT&CK behaviours, sparse use of ICS and insider-threat datasets, and weak support for multi-stage or multi-dataset evaluation. These findings provide a more focused and actionable evidence base for future ML-based cyber defense research.

ElectronicsVol. 15(13)
University of Gloucestershire (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.