Justice Without Lawyers? Insights from Italian Mediation

Abstract This paper examines the relationship between attorneys’ representation of litigants and mediation outcomes in Italy. Based on exclusive data from a selection of Italian cities during the 2011–2017 period, we investigate whether attorneys’ involvement in a case is related to the parties’ probability to enter into a mediation agreement. We are particularly interested in Italian mediation because of its mandatory nature for selected categories of cases. Findings supply evidence on the puzzling role of lawyers in mediation. While plaintiffs’ legal representation turns out to be positively related to an increase in the likelihood of a mediation success, the sign is, unexpectedly but robustly, opposite in the case of defendants. Similar results seem to suggest that in the case of attorneys’ presence, the outcome of mediation mainly depends on their incentives and clients’ motivation within the process of dispute resolution. Beyond the scholarly interest, such results have also interesting policy implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Law & Economics
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2025-0063
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justice Without Lawyers? Insights from Italian Mediation

Giovanni Battista Ramello, Alessandro Melcarne, Svitlana Zadorozhna
Review of Law & Economics
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Justice Without Lawyers? Insights from Italian Mediation

Giovanni Battista Ramello, Alessandro Melcarne, Svitlana Zadorozhna
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the relationship between attorneys’ representation of litigants and mediation outcomes in Italy. Based on exclusive data from a selection of Italian cities during the 2011–2017 period, we investigate whether attorneys’ involvement in a case is related to the parties’ probability to enter into a mediation agreement. We are particularly interested in Italian mediation because of its mandatory nature for selected categories of cases. Findings supply evidence on the puzzling role of lawyers in mediation. While plaintiffs’ legal representation turns out to be positively related to an increase in the likelihood of a mediation success, the sign is, unexpectedly but robustly, opposite in the case of defendants. Similar results seem to suggest that in the case of attorneys’ presence, the outcome of mediation mainly depends on their incentives and clients’ motivation within the process of dispute resolution. Beyond the scholarly interest, such results have also interesting policy implications.

Review of Law & Economics
University of Padua (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.