Global Periodization of World History: A Structural Model from Anthropogenesis to the Present

This article proposes a structural framework for the global periodization of world history, tracing the biological and socio‐cultural evolution of humanity from the emergence of the genus Homo to the present. Instead of relying solely on conventional chronological labels, historical periods are defined by major transformations in technological systems, economic organization, and patterns of large‐scale human interaction. Four major ethnocultural areas—African, Macro‐Eurasian, Sahulian, and American—are examined within acomparative perspective. The Macro‐Eurasian region serves as a primary analytical reference point for synchronizing global processes because of the early emergence of complex societies and written sources, though the framework remains comparative rather than hierarchical. The proposed periodization integrates established archaeological and historical epochs within a unified structural model emphasizing technological change, intercultural interaction and migration processes. By grounding period boundaries in shifts of underlying historical mechanisms, the model enables systematic cross‐regional comparison of long‐term human development.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20841145
Primary Topic
World Systems and Global Transformations
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Global Periodization of World History: A Structural Model from Anthropogenesis to the Present

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
World Systems and Global Transformations
preprint

Global Periodization of World History: A Structural Model from Anthropogenesis to the Present

preprint en

Abstract

This article proposes a structural framework for the global periodization of world history, tracing the biological and socio‐cultural evolution of humanity from the emergence of the genus Homo to the present. Instead of relying solely on conventional chronological labels, historical periods are defined by major transformations in technological systems, economic organization, and patterns of large‐scale human interaction. Four major ethnocultural areas—African, Macro‐Eurasian, Sahulian, and American—are examined within acomparative perspective. The Macro‐Eurasian region serves as a primary analytical reference point for synchronizing global processes because of the early emergence of complex societies and written sources, though the framework remains comparative rather than hierarchical. The proposed periodization integrates established archaeological and historical epochs within a unified structural model emphasizing technological change, intercultural interaction and migration processes. By grounding period boundaries in shifts of underlying historical mechanisms, the model enables systematic cross‐regional comparison of long‐term human development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
World Systems and Global Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.