Social Relationship Coping Efficacy Scale: Validity and reliability study

Background The Social Relationship Coping Efficacy Scale (SRCE) evaluates how effectively cancer patients maintain social relationships. This study aimed to adapt the scale into Turkish (SRCE-TR) and examine its psychometric properties.Methods This methodological study included 202 adult cancer patients in Türkiye who were aware of their diagnosis. Data were collected using the SRCE-TR, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Content validity was confirmed by expert opinions, and construct validity was evaluated through Exploratory Factor Analysis and convergent validity analyses (Pearson correlation and bootstrap multiple linear regression). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest methods.Results Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a single-factor structure explaining 51.13% of the total variance. The SRCE-TR demonstrated moderate constructive validity, correlating significantly with the MSPSS (r = 0.308) and BRS (r = 0.310). Furthermore multiple linear regression analysis with bootstrapping indicated that the model significantly predicted SRCE-TR scores (R2_{adj} = 0.219, p < 0.001). Perceived family support (β = 0.360, p < 0.001) and resilience (β= 0.258, p < 0.001) emerged as the primary significant predictors of the scale scores.Conclusion The SRCE-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing coping efficacy in maintaining social relationships among Turkish cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2026.2693692
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Relationship Coping Efficacy Scale: Validity and reliability study

Meryem Yılmaz, Hatice Çakır
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Social Relationship Coping Efficacy Scale: Validity and reliability study

Meryem Yılmaz, Hatice Çakır
article en

Abstract

Background The Social Relationship Coping Efficacy Scale (SRCE) evaluates how effectively cancer patients maintain social relationships. This study aimed to adapt the scale into Turkish (SRCE-TR) and examine its psychometric properties.Methods This methodological study included 202 adult cancer patients in Türkiye who were aware of their diagnosis. Data were collected using the SRCE-TR, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Content validity was confirmed by expert opinions, and construct validity was evaluated through Exploratory Factor Analysis and convergent validity analyses (Pearson correlation and bootstrap multiple linear regression). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest methods.Results Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a single-factor structure explaining 51.13% of the total variance. The SRCE-TR demonstrated moderate constructive validity, correlating significantly with the MSPSS (r = 0.308) and BRS (r = 0.310). Furthermore multiple linear regression analysis with bootstrapping indicated that the model significantly predicted SRCE-TR scores (R2_{adj} = 0.219, p < 0.001). Perceived family support (β = 0.360, p < 0.001) and resilience (β= 0.258, p < 0.001) emerged as the primary significant predictors of the scale scores.Conclusion The SRCE-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing coping efficacy in maintaining social relationships among Turkish cancer patients.

Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR), Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi (TR), Turgut Özal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.