Effects of Combined Pectoserratus and Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Objectives: Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have emerged as opioid-sparing analgesic strategies for cardiac surgery; however, evidence regarding combined block techniques remains limited. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the analgesic efficacy of combined pectoserratus plane block (PSPB) and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Methods: Sixty-two adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to either a block group receiving bilateral PSPB and PIFB after anesthetic induction or a control group receiving conventional analgesia alone. The primary outcome was postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included Korean version of Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) scores, total opioid consumption, rescue analgesic dose, time to first rescue analgesia, extubation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative VAS scores did not differ significantly between groups after Bonferroni correction for repeated measurements. No significant overall between-group effect was observed in repeated-measures ANOVA. ICU stay was statistically shorter in the block group, although the absolute difference was small and of uncertain clinical relevance. No significant differences were observed in the remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Combined PSPB and PIFB did not reduce postoperative pain or improve recovery outcomes after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Early postoperative pain scores were numerically higher in the block group, although these differences were not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. The incremental analgesic benefit of combined fascial plane blocks may therefore be limited in this clinical setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134946
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Combined Pectoserratus and Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jung Hyun So, Soonchang Hong, Yeong-Gwan Jeon, Ji-Hyoung Park et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Effects of Combined Pectoserratus and Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jung Hyun So, Soonchang Hong, Yeong-Gwan Jeon, Ji-Hyoung Park, Bosung Kim
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have emerged as opioid-sparing analgesic strategies for cardiac surgery; however, evidence regarding combined block techniques remains limited. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the analgesic efficacy of combined pectoserratus plane block (PSPB) and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Methods: Sixty-two adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to either a block group receiving bilateral PSPB and PIFB after anesthetic induction or a control group receiving conventional analgesia alone. The primary outcome was postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included Korean version of Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) scores, total opioid consumption, rescue analgesic dose, time to first rescue analgesia, extubation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative VAS scores did not differ significantly between groups after Bonferroni correction for repeated measurements. No significant overall between-group effect was observed in repeated-measures ANOVA. ICU stay was statistically shorter in the block group, although the absolute difference was small and of uncertain clinical relevance. No significant differences were observed in the remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Combined PSPB and PIFB did not reduce postoperative pain or improve recovery outcomes after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Early postoperative pain scores were numerically higher in the block group, although these differences were not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. The incremental analgesic benefit of combined fascial plane blocks may therefore be limited in this clinical setting.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(13)
Yonsei University (KR)
Yonsei University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.