Quality of life of patients after laparoscopic and open hernioplasty for inguinal hernias.

Abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open hernioplasty in patients with inguinal hernias in terms of postoperative complications, recovery duration, and overall quality of life. The study was conducted in 2024 at the Regional Hospital in Osh (Kyrgyzstan). A total of 224 patients participated: 86 underwent open hernioplasty (Group 2) and 138 underwent laparoscopic surgery (Group 1). The methodology included the analysis of medical records, standardised questionnaires, assessment of pain using the visual analogue scale, hospitalisation duration, complication rates, and time to return to normal daily life. The results showed that patients who underwent laparoscopy experienced significant advantages. The average pain level in the first 48 hours after surgery was 3.2±1.1 points, compared to 5.4±1.6 in the open surgery group. The average hospital stay was 2.3 days in the laparoscopic group and 4.6 days in the open group. The complication rate (infections, seromas, haematomas) was 8% versus 18%. Full recovery and return to daily activity took 14 days after laparoscopy, compared to 28 days after open surgery. The recurrence rate within 6 months was 2% in the first group versus 7% in the second. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery also reported a higher level of satisfaction with the quality of life. The results could be used in clinical practice to support informed decision-making when choosing the surgical approach, with the aim of improving treatment outcomes and enhancing postoperative adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7417/ct.2026.2057
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of life of patients after laparoscopic and open hernioplasty for inguinal hernias.

Abdyrakman Eshiev, Nurdin Mamanov, Kubanychbek Alibekov
PubMed
Hernia repair and management
article

Quality of life of patients after laparoscopic and open hernioplasty for inguinal hernias.

Abdyrakman Eshiev, Nurdin Mamanov, Kubanychbek Alibekov
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open hernioplasty in patients with inguinal hernias in terms of postoperative complications, recovery duration, and overall quality of life. The study was conducted in 2024 at the Regional Hospital in Osh (Kyrgyzstan). A total of 224 patients participated: 86 underwent open hernioplasty (Group 2) and 138 underwent laparoscopic surgery (Group 1). The methodology included the analysis of medical records, standardised questionnaires, assessment of pain using the visual analogue scale, hospitalisation duration, complication rates, and time to return to normal daily life. The results showed that patients who underwent laparoscopy experienced significant advantages. The average pain level in the first 48 hours after surgery was 3.2±1.1 points, compared to 5.4±1.6 in the open surgery group. The average hospital stay was 2.3 days in the laparoscopic group and 4.6 days in the open group. The complication rate (infections, seromas, haematomas) was 8% versus 18%. Full recovery and return to daily activity took 14 days after laparoscopy, compared to 28 days after open surgery. The recurrence rate within 6 months was 2% in the first group versus 7% in the second. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery also reported a higher level of satisfaction with the quality of life. The results could be used in clinical practice to support informed decision-making when choosing the surgical approach, with the aim of improving treatment outcomes and enhancing postoperative adaptation.

PubMedVol. 177(4)
Osh State University (KG), International University of Kyrgyzstan (KG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.