Application of health belief model (HBM) in health sciences and medical researches: systematic review on African and Asian countries

BACKGROUND: The Health Belief Model (HBM) is a widely used psychological framework for explaining and predicting individual's health related attitudes, belief, and behaviors. Although the model has been applied across various fields of health and medical sciences, the extent of its global use, particularly across African and Asian countries has not been well documented. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the application of HBM in health sciences and medical research conducted between 2010 and 2025 in Africa and Asian countries. METHODS: The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted using keywords "Health Belief Model" combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR) across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research articles applying the HBM within African and Asian contexts. RESULT: From a total of 1,421 identified records, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 61% (n = 47) were conducted in Africa countries and 39% (n = 30) in Asian countries. Most studies (64.94%) employed cross-sectional quantitative design, while 12% used mixed-methods approaches. Random controlled trial account for 9.11% of studies, quasi-experimental design for 7%, and qualitative approaches (including focus groups and in-depth interviews) for 6%. Overall, 85.71% of the studies applied all core components of HBM. Fifteen studies examined COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, nine focused on HIV/AIDS testing, counseling and prevention, and eleven studies explored non-communicable diseases prevention. Additionally, six studies assessed women's adherence to breast cancer screening, and four studies examined cervical cancer screening behaviours using HBM. CONCLUSION: A current systematic review demonstrates that the HBM remain a valuable framework for understanding and influencing health behaviors across diverse settings. Its application in Africa and Asian research highlights its usefulness in guiding targeted interventions that address perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and cues to action, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28281-5
Primary Topic
Historical and modern epidemiology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of health belief model (HBM) in health sciences and medical researches: systematic review on African and Asian countries

Gari Hunduma, Ebisa Zerihun, Shiferaw Letta, Sina Temesgen Tolera
BMC Public Health
Historical and modern epidemiology studies
article

Application of health belief model (HBM) in health sciences and medical researches: systematic review on African and Asian countries

Gari Hunduma, Ebisa Zerihun, Shiferaw Letta, Sina Temesgen Tolera
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Health Belief Model (HBM) is a widely used psychological framework for explaining and predicting individual's health related attitudes, belief, and behaviors. Although the model has been applied across various fields of health and medical sciences, the extent of its global use, particularly across African and Asian countries has not been well documented. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the application of HBM in health sciences and medical research conducted between 2010 and 2025 in Africa and Asian countries. METHODS: The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted using keywords "Health Belief Model" combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR) across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research articles applying the HBM within African and Asian contexts. RESULT: From a total of 1,421 identified records, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 61% (n = 47) were conducted in Africa countries and 39% (n = 30) in Asian countries. Most studies (64.94%) employed cross-sectional quantitative design, while 12% used mixed-methods approaches. Random controlled trial account for 9.11% of studies, quasi-experimental design for 7%, and qualitative approaches (including focus groups and in-depth interviews) for 6%. Overall, 85.71% of the studies applied all core components of HBM. Fifteen studies examined COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, nine focused on HIV/AIDS testing, counseling and prevention, and eleven studies explored non-communicable diseases prevention. Additionally, six studies assessed women's adherence to breast cancer screening, and four studies examined cervical cancer screening behaviours using HBM. CONCLUSION: A current systematic review demonstrates that the HBM remain a valuable framework for understanding and influencing health behaviors across diverse settings. Its application in Africa and Asian research highlights its usefulness in guiding targeted interventions that address perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and cues to action, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes.

BMC Public Health
Haramaya University (ET), Bule Hora University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical and modern epidemiology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.