Thermo-Hydraulic and Thermodynamic Analysis of Rotational–Perforated Static Mixer

To clarify the thermo-hydraulic performance and thermodynamic characteristics of rotational–perforated static mixer (RPSM) for laminar heat transfer enhancement in circular tubes, a three-dimensional steady laminar flow model was developed for inlet Reynolds numbers from 200 to 1000. The heat transfer enhancement, resistance increase, and irreversible losses of RPSM with two installation modes and Kenics were comparatively analyzed. The results show that RPSM (forward) exhibits the strongest practical heat transfer performance. Its convective heat transfer coefficient is on average 39.8% higher than that of Kenics, while its thermal effectiveness and number of transfer units are increased by 21.3% and 32.8%, respectively. However, the heat transfer enhancement of RPSM is accompanied by a significant increase in flow resistance. The Z-factors of RPSM (forward) and RPSM (backward) are approximately 3.4 and 6.2 times that of Kenics, respectively. Second law analysis shows that the Bejan numbers of all configurations are close to unity, indicating that total entropy generation is mainly dominated by heat transfer entropy generation. Although RPSM (forward) has a higher exergy destruction rate, its second law efficiency is on average 20.1% higher than that of Kenics. Flow–heat transfer coupling visualization shows that RPSM (forward) can maintain relatively continuous swirling and secondary flow structures, thereby promoting radial energy transport and temperature field uniformity. In contrast, RPSM (backward) induces stronger local recirculation and pressure loss, resulting in higher pumping power demand. Overall, for the specific RPSM geometry and Reynolds number range investigated in this study, RPSM (forward) shows advantages in heat transfer capacity and thermal exergy utilization, but these advantages are accompanied by a substantial flow resistance penalty. Therefore, further structural optimization should focus on retaining radial transport while reducing local pressure loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14132060
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermo-Hydraulic and Thermodynamic Analysis of Rotational–Perforated Static Mixer

Meng Tang, L Wang, Zixuan Guo, Dewu Wang et al.
Processes
Heat Transfer and Optimization
article

Thermo-Hydraulic and Thermodynamic Analysis of Rotational–Perforated Static Mixer

Meng Tang, L Wang, Zixuan Guo, Dewu Wang, Xuefang Gao, Ruojin Wang, Liu Y, Hongrui Wei, Shaofeng Zhang
article en

Abstract

To clarify the thermo-hydraulic performance and thermodynamic characteristics of rotational–perforated static mixer (RPSM) for laminar heat transfer enhancement in circular tubes, a three-dimensional steady laminar flow model was developed for inlet Reynolds numbers from 200 to 1000. The heat transfer enhancement, resistance increase, and irreversible losses of RPSM with two installation modes and Kenics were comparatively analyzed. The results show that RPSM (forward) exhibits the strongest practical heat transfer performance. Its convective heat transfer coefficient is on average 39.8% higher than that of Kenics, while its thermal effectiveness and number of transfer units are increased by 21.3% and 32.8%, respectively. However, the heat transfer enhancement of RPSM is accompanied by a significant increase in flow resistance. The Z-factors of RPSM (forward) and RPSM (backward) are approximately 3.4 and 6.2 times that of Kenics, respectively. Second law analysis shows that the Bejan numbers of all configurations are close to unity, indicating that total entropy generation is mainly dominated by heat transfer entropy generation. Although RPSM (forward) has a higher exergy destruction rate, its second law efficiency is on average 20.1% higher than that of Kenics. Flow–heat transfer coupling visualization shows that RPSM (forward) can maintain relatively continuous swirling and secondary flow structures, thereby promoting radial energy transport and temperature field uniformity. In contrast, RPSM (backward) induces stronger local recirculation and pressure loss, resulting in higher pumping power demand. Overall, for the specific RPSM geometry and Reynolds number range investigated in this study, RPSM (forward) shows advantages in heat transfer capacity and thermal exergy utilization, but these advantages are accompanied by a substantial flow resistance penalty. Therefore, further structural optimization should focus on retaining radial transport while reducing local pressure loss.

ProcessesVol. 14(13)
Hebei University of Technology (CN), Tianjin Vocational Institute (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.