Consolidating Commission Executive Power Through the European Competitiveness Fund?

What does the Multiannual Financial Framework proposal reveal about the Commission’s ambition for the future of the interinstitutional dynamics at the Union level? Recently, the EU budget has become an increasingly political and politicised instrument, as the Union’s spending power now appears as the main means through which it may pursue political objectives. In this context, understanding who holds the purse strings is a particularly sensitive question. Building on the literature addressing the rise of the executive, and especially the Commission, in EU economic governance, this article demonstrates that the proposal for a European Competitiveness Fund follows this trend and even reinforces it. The reliance on delegated and implementing acts, combined with the procedures envisaged for their adoption, places the Commission in a central position within a formally compliant institutional balance, yet subject to weak legal constraints and limited accountability mechanisms. The article concludes with policy recommendations to strengthen accountability in the allocation of EU funding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/902
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consolidating Commission Executive Power Through the European Competitiveness Fund?

Julien Debande
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Consolidating Commission Executive Power Through the European Competitiveness Fund?

Julien Debande
article en

Abstract

What does the Multiannual Financial Framework proposal reveal about the Commission’s ambition for the future of the interinstitutional dynamics at the Union level? Recently, the EU budget has become an increasingly political and politicised instrument, as the Union’s spending power now appears as the main means through which it may pursue political objectives. In this context, understanding who holds the purse strings is a particularly sensitive question. Building on the literature addressing the rise of the executive, and especially the Commission, in EU economic governance, this article demonstrates that the proposal for a European Competitiveness Fund follows this trend and even reinforces it. The reliance on delegated and implementing acts, combined with the procedures envisaged for their adoption, places the Commission in a central position within a formally compliant institutional balance, yet subject to weak legal constraints and limited accountability mechanisms. The article concludes with policy recommendations to strengthen accountability in the allocation of EU funding.

Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.