Dose–response modelling uncovers compound‐specific inhibitory effects of host defence volatiles on mountain pine beetle fungal symbionts

BACKGROUND: The mountain pine beetle relies on symbiotic fungi to overcome host tree defences, yet these fungi must tolerate the toxic volatile compounds produced by their hosts. However, how individual volatiles affect fungal symbionts and whether these effects constrain fungal performance when exposed to such toxic compounds remain poorly understood. Quantifying the responses of mountain pine beetle fungal symbionts to host defence volatiles can help explain growth constraints within beetle-fungus symbioses in host trees. RESULTS: We evaluated the toxicity of eight pine defence volatiles, seven monoterpenes and one phenylpropene, 4-allylanisole, on the three primary fungal symbionts, Grosmannia clavigera, Leptographium longiclavatum and Ophiostoma montium, of the mountain pine beetle in vitro. Fungal cultures were exposed to a range of concentrations of each volatile, and individual growth responses were quantified to determine dose-response relationships. All volatiles reduced fungal growth, except for (-)-α-pinene against L. longiclavatum, although sensitivity varied substantially among fungal species and volatiles. Grosmannia clavigera was overall the most strongly inhibited. We found that toxicity differed between enantiomers. Among the volatiles tested, 4-allylanisole and terpinolene were highly toxic to fungi, whereas (-)-α-pinene was the least inhibitory overall. Even with comparable concentrations at intermediate inhibitory potency, some volatiles (e.g. 3-carene) required much higher concentrations to achieve near-complete growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: These findings show that pine defence volatiles exert differential, compound-specific impacts on the fungal symbionts of mountain pine beetles, suggesting that chemical diversity in tree defences may enhance their defences by simultaneously targeting multiple components of the beetle-fungus symbioses. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pest Management Science
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.71060
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dose–response modelling uncovers compound‐specific inhibitory effects of host defence volatiles on mountain pine beetle fungal symbionts

Nadir Erbilgin, Guncha Ishangulyyeva, Yanzhuo Liu, X F Zhao et al.
Pest Management Science
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

Dose–response modelling uncovers compound‐specific inhibitory effects of host defence volatiles on mountain pine beetle fungal symbionts

Nadir Erbilgin, Guncha Ishangulyyeva, Yanzhuo Liu, X F Zhao, Duo Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mountain pine beetle relies on symbiotic fungi to overcome host tree defences, yet these fungi must tolerate the toxic volatile compounds produced by their hosts. However, how individual volatiles affect fungal symbionts and whether these effects constrain fungal performance when exposed to such toxic compounds remain poorly understood. Quantifying the responses of mountain pine beetle fungal symbionts to host defence volatiles can help explain growth constraints within beetle-fungus symbioses in host trees. RESULTS: We evaluated the toxicity of eight pine defence volatiles, seven monoterpenes and one phenylpropene, 4-allylanisole, on the three primary fungal symbionts, Grosmannia clavigera, Leptographium longiclavatum and Ophiostoma montium, of the mountain pine beetle in vitro. Fungal cultures were exposed to a range of concentrations of each volatile, and individual growth responses were quantified to determine dose-response relationships. All volatiles reduced fungal growth, except for (-)-α-pinene against L. longiclavatum, although sensitivity varied substantially among fungal species and volatiles. Grosmannia clavigera was overall the most strongly inhibited. We found that toxicity differed between enantiomers. Among the volatiles tested, 4-allylanisole and terpinolene were highly toxic to fungi, whereas (-)-α-pinene was the least inhibitory overall. Even with comparable concentrations at intermediate inhibitory potency, some volatiles (e.g. 3-carene) required much higher concentrations to achieve near-complete growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: These findings show that pine defence volatiles exert differential, compound-specific impacts on the fungal symbionts of mountain pine beetles, suggesting that chemical diversity in tree defences may enhance their defences by simultaneously targeting multiple components of the beetle-fungus symbioses. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Pest Management Science
University of Alberta (CA), Jilin University (CN)
China Scholarship Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.