Local anesthetic hypersensitivity: Frequently suspected, rarely proven: A retrospective study of 101 patients

Introduction: Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used to provide regional insensitivity in dentistry, minor surgical procedures, and general anesthesia but may rarely cause allergic reactions. Methods: The file data of 101 patients who were referred to the Department of Allergy and Immunology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, with a suspected LA allergy between February 2020 and August 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included in the study were contacted by phone and asked whether they had used LAs after the test and whether any reactions had developed. Results: Female patients comprised 81% (n = 82) of the study cohort. Patients were predominantly referred from the departments of dentistry (45% [n = 46]) and anesthesiology (22% [n = 22]). Patients were referred due to reactions related to LAs alone (n = 51) and both LAs and other drugs (n = 50). The severity of LA reactions was mild (n = 47), moderate (n = 36), or severe (n = 18), with dyspnea being the most common symptom (n = 47). Prick-intradermal (P-ID) and provocation tests were performed on all the patients (suspected LAs [n = 32], alternative LAs [n = 23], random [n = 46]). Only one patient tested positive in the P-ID test, and a provocation test was performed on this patient with an alternative agent, with a negative result. Of the 80 patients reached by phone, 41 received LAs based on test results and did not develop an allergic reaction, whereas the other 39 patients did not receive LAs. Conclusion: Immunologically mediated reactions to LAs were exceedingly rare in this study. These findings highlight that most suspected reactions are not attributable to confirmed allergic mechanisms and underscore the importance of a careful clinical history and guideline-based evaluation to avoid unnecessary drug avoidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2026.47.260038
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local anesthetic hypersensitivity: Frequently suspected, rarely proven: A retrospective study of 101 patients

Nihal METE GÖKMEN, Sin A, Özlem LİMONCU, Zuleyha Galata et al.
1 citations
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
13.45
article

Local anesthetic hypersensitivity: Frequently suspected, rarely proven: A retrospective study of 101 patients

Nihal METE GÖKMEN, Sin A, Özlem LİMONCU, Zuleyha Galata, Ali Kokuludag, Ceyda Tunakan Dalgıc, Reyhan Gumusburun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used to provide regional insensitivity in dentistry, minor surgical procedures, and general anesthesia but may rarely cause allergic reactions. Methods: The file data of 101 patients who were referred to the Department of Allergy and Immunology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, with a suspected LA allergy between February 2020 and August 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included in the study were contacted by phone and asked whether they had used LAs after the test and whether any reactions had developed. Results: Female patients comprised 81% (n = 82) of the study cohort. Patients were predominantly referred from the departments of dentistry (45% [n = 46]) and anesthesiology (22% [n = 22]). Patients were referred due to reactions related to LAs alone (n = 51) and both LAs and other drugs (n = 50). The severity of LA reactions was mild (n = 47), moderate (n = 36), or severe (n = 18), with dyspnea being the most common symptom (n = 47). Prick-intradermal (P-ID) and provocation tests were performed on all the patients (suspected LAs [n = 32], alternative LAs [n = 23], random [n = 46]). Only one patient tested positive in the P-ID test, and a provocation test was performed on this patient with an alternative agent, with a negative result. Of the 80 patients reached by phone, 41 received LAs based on test results and did not develop an allergic reaction, whereas the other 39 patients did not receive LAs. Conclusion: Immunologically mediated reactions to LAs were exceedingly rare in this study. These findings highlight that most suspected reactions are not attributable to confirmed allergic mechanisms and underscore the importance of a careful clinical history and guideline-based evaluation to avoid unnecessary drug avoidance.

Allergy and Asthma ProceedingsVol. 47(4)
Ege University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
13.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.