Clinical Risk Management and Patient-safety Research: A Large-scale Bibliometric Mapping of the Field and Its Emerging Directions (Master vs. 2021-2025)

BACKGROUND: To map the evolution, knowledge structure, and emerging directions of clinical risk management (CRM) and patient-safety research by contrasting a full-timespan corpus with the most recent 5-year subset. METHODS: Records were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection (n=23,498; 1986-2026) and Scopus (n=51,710; 1958-2026) using harmonized queries targeting patient safety, adverse events, medical error, medication safety, and CRM tools in health care settings. We performed descriptive bibliometrics and science mapping (co-word analysis of author keywords; country collaboration) and used the WoS cited-reference field for citation-based intellectual-structure analyses. Master outputs were compared with 2021 to 2025 (WoS n=10,245; Scopus n=21,299), with selected visualizations on a deduplicated WoS+Scopus data set (master n=55,722; 2021-2025 n=22,782). RESULTS: The 2021 to 2025 window accounted for 43.6% of the WoS corpus and 41.2% of the Scopus corpus. Core sources included dedicated patient-safety outlets and leading quality-and-safety journals; in the recent subset, pharmacovigilance journals emerged more prominently, reflecting medication-safety terminology. Recurrent themes encompassed safety culture and climate, adverse-event detection, incident reporting and learning systems, and proactive and reactive CRM tools (checklists, root cause analysis, HFMEA). Relative prominence increased for COVID-19 and data-driven methods (AI/machine learning) in 2021 to 2025. CONCLUSIONS: Within the published literature, CRM and patient-safety research now forms a multi-cluster knowledge base linking culture, measurement, improvement, and technology-enabled surveillance. These bibliometric patterns describe research activity and field structure rather than adoption in practice or changes in patient outcomes, and should inform research prioritization and safety governance accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000001554
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Risk Management and Patient-safety Research: A Large-scale Bibliometric Mapping of the Field and Its Emerging Directions (Master vs. 2021-2025)

Biagio Solarino, Alessandro Dell'Erba, Davide Ferorelli, Federica Mele et al.
Journal of Patient Safety
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Clinical Risk Management and Patient-safety Research: A Large-scale Bibliometric Mapping of the Field and Its Emerging Directions (Master vs. 2021-2025)

Biagio Solarino, Alessandro Dell'Erba, Davide Ferorelli, Federica Mele, Federica Misceo, Fiorenza Zotti, Gianmarco Sirago
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To map the evolution, knowledge structure, and emerging directions of clinical risk management (CRM) and patient-safety research by contrasting a full-timespan corpus with the most recent 5-year subset. METHODS: Records were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection (n=23,498; 1986-2026) and Scopus (n=51,710; 1958-2026) using harmonized queries targeting patient safety, adverse events, medical error, medication safety, and CRM tools in health care settings. We performed descriptive bibliometrics and science mapping (co-word analysis of author keywords; country collaboration) and used the WoS cited-reference field for citation-based intellectual-structure analyses. Master outputs were compared with 2021 to 2025 (WoS n=10,245; Scopus n=21,299), with selected visualizations on a deduplicated WoS+Scopus data set (master n=55,722; 2021-2025 n=22,782). RESULTS: The 2021 to 2025 window accounted for 43.6% of the WoS corpus and 41.2% of the Scopus corpus. Core sources included dedicated patient-safety outlets and leading quality-and-safety journals; in the recent subset, pharmacovigilance journals emerged more prominently, reflecting medication-safety terminology. Recurrent themes encompassed safety culture and climate, adverse-event detection, incident reporting and learning systems, and proactive and reactive CRM tools (checklists, root cause analysis, HFMEA). Relative prominence increased for COVID-19 and data-driven methods (AI/machine learning) in 2021 to 2025. CONCLUSIONS: Within the published literature, CRM and patient-safety research now forms a multi-cluster knowledge base linking culture, measurement, improvement, and technology-enabled surveillance. These bibliometric patterns describe research activity and field structure rather than adoption in practice or changes in patient outcomes, and should inform research prioritization and safety governance accordingly.

Journal of Patient Safety
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.