A Systematic Review of Different Carbon Capture Technology Simulation Tools

The growing global demand for energy and rising greenhouse gas emissions require effective mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. This study reviews 16 widely used simulation tools, including Aspen Plus, MATLAB, Fluent, and gPROMS, for steady-state and dynamic modeling of post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion carbon capture processes. The tools are evaluated using five criteria: chemical process simulation capability, dynamic modeling functionality, thermodynamic property management, heat transfer accuracy, and tool integration features. The results reveal distinct strengths across platforms. Aspen Plus and Aspen Plus Dynamics perform strongly in chemical process simulation and thermodynamic property modeling, reflecting their robustness in reaction modeling and property estimation. gPROMS excels in dynamic modeling, demonstrating strong capability for time-dependent and transient process analysis. MATLAB achieves the highest score in tool integration, highlighting its flexibility in coupling with optimization solvers, control systems, and external programming environments. Fluent shows strong performance in heat transfer modeling, particularly for detailed thermal analysis in oxy-fuel combustion systems. Most existing studies focus on individual carbon capture technologies rather than simulation tool capabilities. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of Scopus yielded 53 peer-reviewed papers on CCS simulation, which were analyzed to identify dominant tools and inform the AHP-based evaluation. This work addresses that gap by clarifying tool-specific advantages, supporting informed model selection to improve the efficiency and sustainability of CCS process design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19132988
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Different Carbon Capture Technology Simulation Tools

Mark Mba Wright, Cameron A. MacKenzie, Moones Keshvarinia
Energies
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

A Systematic Review of Different Carbon Capture Technology Simulation Tools

Mark Mba Wright, Cameron A. MacKenzie, Moones Keshvarinia
article en

Abstract

The growing global demand for energy and rising greenhouse gas emissions require effective mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. This study reviews 16 widely used simulation tools, including Aspen Plus, MATLAB, Fluent, and gPROMS, for steady-state and dynamic modeling of post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion carbon capture processes. The tools are evaluated using five criteria: chemical process simulation capability, dynamic modeling functionality, thermodynamic property management, heat transfer accuracy, and tool integration features. The results reveal distinct strengths across platforms. Aspen Plus and Aspen Plus Dynamics perform strongly in chemical process simulation and thermodynamic property modeling, reflecting their robustness in reaction modeling and property estimation. gPROMS excels in dynamic modeling, demonstrating strong capability for time-dependent and transient process analysis. MATLAB achieves the highest score in tool integration, highlighting its flexibility in coupling with optimization solvers, control systems, and external programming environments. Fluent shows strong performance in heat transfer modeling, particularly for detailed thermal analysis in oxy-fuel combustion systems. Most existing studies focus on individual carbon capture technologies rather than simulation tool capabilities. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of Scopus yielded 53 peer-reviewed papers on CCS simulation, which were analyzed to identify dominant tools and inform the AHP-based evaluation. This work addresses that gap by clarifying tool-specific advantages, supporting informed model selection to improve the efficiency and sustainability of CCS process design.

EnergiesVol. 19(13)
Iowa State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.