Multicenter evaluation of real-time artificial intelligence assistance for carotid artery stenting

BACKGROUND: Unintended device movement during carotid artery stenting (CAS) may lead to procedural complications. Our previous preliminary single-center study using a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) assistance system suggested that AI may help detect such movements and offer potential clinical usefulness; however, the small sample size limited the strength of the findings. In this multicenter study, we aimed to validate the accuracy and clinical utility of this real-time AI system in a diverse cohort. METHODS: A total of 53 consecutive CAS procedures with distal filter protection were performed at three institutions under real-time AI monitoring. The AI system continuously analyzed fluoroscopic images and issued notifications when filter devices, guiding catheters, or guidewires moved outside predefined areas or went off-screen. Two types of distal filter protection devices were used. The participating institutions used two angiography systems. The efficacy, safety, and accuracy of the software were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed by filter type and operator experience. RESULTS: On average, there were 13.1 AI notifications per case, including 11.4 true positives and 1.7 false positives. The overall precision and recall were 87% and 98%, respectively. In 32% of true positive notifications, the operator adjusted the inappropriate device position after the notification. No significant differences were observed across filter types or operator experience. No AI-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study demonstrated consistent performance of real-time AI-assisted notifications of device movement during CAS across multiple institutions and operators. The system showed high accuracy and supports its integration into standard neuroendovascular workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2026-025520
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter evaluation of real-time artificial intelligence assistance for carotid artery stenting

Hiroki Nagatsuka, Kazuya Higashizono, Kenichi Kono, Yoshikazu Matsuda et al.
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Multicenter evaluation of real-time artificial intelligence assistance for carotid artery stenting

Hiroki Nagatsuka, Kazuya Higashizono, Kenichi Kono, Yoshikazu Matsuda, Ryo Aiura, Yuya Sakakura, Yoichi Morofuji, Yasunobu MITSURA, Ikuya Natori, Akihiro Sakaguchi, Takeshi Fujimoto
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unintended device movement during carotid artery stenting (CAS) may lead to procedural complications. Our previous preliminary single-center study using a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) assistance system suggested that AI may help detect such movements and offer potential clinical usefulness; however, the small sample size limited the strength of the findings. In this multicenter study, we aimed to validate the accuracy and clinical utility of this real-time AI system in a diverse cohort. METHODS: A total of 53 consecutive CAS procedures with distal filter protection were performed at three institutions under real-time AI monitoring. The AI system continuously analyzed fluoroscopic images and issued notifications when filter devices, guiding catheters, or guidewires moved outside predefined areas or went off-screen. Two types of distal filter protection devices were used. The participating institutions used two angiography systems. The efficacy, safety, and accuracy of the software were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed by filter type and operator experience. RESULTS: On average, there were 13.1 AI notifications per case, including 11.4 true positives and 1.7 false positives. The overall precision and recall were 87% and 98%, respectively. In 32% of true positive notifications, the operator adjusted the inappropriate device position after the notification. No significant differences were observed across filter types or operator experience. No AI-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study demonstrated consistent performance of real-time AI-assisted notifications of device movement during CAS across multiple institutions and operators. The system showed high accuracy and supports its integration into standard neuroendovascular workflows.

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
SHOWA Medical University (JP), NTT Medical Center (JP), SHOWA Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital (JP), SHOWA Medical University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.