Considering the Resistance and Resilience Framework as a Tool for Building Site-Appropriate Restoration Seed Mixes

Successfully restoring rangelands hinges on the design of site-appropriate seed mixes that enhance species establishment and persistence. There is a need for tools to facilitate the design process, particularly in regions like the Intermountain West, USA, where restoration occurs across vast extents of rangeland. The Resistance and Resilience (R&R) framework offers a way to classify sites based on soil moisture and temperature regimes and assess their capacity to resist invasion (e.g., cheatgrass [ Bromus tectorum L.]) and recover from stress and disturbance (e.g., drought, fire). However, the utility of R&R for restoration seed mix design, including the extent to which site-appropriate species selection is consistent with the framework, is unclear. We investigated how species-selection patterns of seedings in Utah, USA, aligned with the R&R framework, as well as the correspondence of those patterns with seed cost and traditionally used elevation and precipitation guidelines found in agency technical documents and tools. We found that species selection was consistent with elevation and precipitation guidelines. Species selection frequency also declined with increasing seed cost, despite the ecological importance of some high-priced species. Selection patterns for many species were distinguishable according to the R&R framework, indicative of being treated as “specialists” for certain R&R categories. High R&R (cold, moist) specialist species were mostly native, while low R&R (warm, dry) species were a mixture of native species and high-performing non-native grasses, such as crested wheatgrass ( Agropyron cristatum [L.] Gaertn.). We advocate for developing plant material (e.g., increase seed collections, production, and supply) to reduce costs of ecologically valuable species. Depending on the field performance of R&R-informed mixes, the framework could be used to create robust, customizable tools for restoration planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2026.05.009
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering the Resistance and Resilience Framework as a Tool for Building Site-Appropriate Restoration Seed Mixes

Kari E. Veblen, Thomas A. Monaco, Melissa L. Landeen, Daniel D. Summers et al.
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

Considering the Resistance and Resilience Framework as a Tool for Building Site-Appropriate Restoration Seed Mixes

Kari E. Veblen, Thomas A. Monaco, Melissa L. Landeen, Daniel D. Summers, Kevin L. Gunnell, Eric Thacker, Spencer J. Good
article en

Abstract

Successfully restoring rangelands hinges on the design of site-appropriate seed mixes that enhance species establishment and persistence. There is a need for tools to facilitate the design process, particularly in regions like the Intermountain West, USA, where restoration occurs across vast extents of rangeland. The Resistance and Resilience (R&R) framework offers a way to classify sites based on soil moisture and temperature regimes and assess their capacity to resist invasion (e.g., cheatgrass [ Bromus tectorum L.]) and recover from stress and disturbance (e.g., drought, fire). However, the utility of R&R for restoration seed mix design, including the extent to which site-appropriate species selection is consistent with the framework, is unclear. We investigated how species-selection patterns of seedings in Utah, USA, aligned with the R&R framework, as well as the correspondence of those patterns with seed cost and traditionally used elevation and precipitation guidelines found in agency technical documents and tools. We found that species selection was consistent with elevation and precipitation guidelines. Species selection frequency also declined with increasing seed cost, despite the ecological importance of some high-priced species. Selection patterns for many species were distinguishable according to the R&R framework, indicative of being treated as “specialists” for certain R&R categories. High R&R (cold, moist) specialist species were mostly native, while low R&R (warm, dry) species were a mixture of native species and high-performing non-native grasses, such as crested wheatgrass ( Agropyron cristatum [L.] Gaertn.). We advocate for developing plant material (e.g., increase seed collections, production, and supply) to reduce costs of ecologically valuable species. Depending on the field performance of R&R-informed mixes, the framework could be used to create robust, customizable tools for restoration planning.

Rangeland Ecology & ManagementVol. 108
Utah State University (US), Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Agricultural Research Service
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.