Experimental assessment and sequential flow–deformation analysis of dewatering strategies in sheet pile-supported excavations

This study evaluates wellpoint and drain dewatering systems through laboratory experiments and sequentially coupled flow–deformation numerical modeling at full-scale geometry (× 20). A 1/20-scale physical model with sixteen pumping wells and six observation wells monitored groundwater drawdown around a 30 × 30 cm 2 excavation. The internal deep drain (h1) achieved the greatest groundwater reduction and highest vertical base settlement (ratio U v max / U h max = 2.48; 81.8% increase relative to the dry reference), whereas the wellpoint system minimized lateral wall displacement while maintaining moderate uplift ( U v max / U h max = 2.55; 24.6% rate of change), providing balanced internal stress reduction with lower shear and bending forces. Construction sequencing significantly influenced excavation response: pre-dewatering (“dewatering then excavation”) reduced excavation uplift by up to − 283.5% compared with the dry reference, while the global factor of safety remained nearly insensitive (< 0.86% variation). These results indicate that combining the wellpoint system with optimized execution sequencing offers the most effective strategy to control groundwater, limit lateral wall movements, and reduce basal heave in excavations in loose to medium-dense sandy soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-59450-6
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental assessment and sequential flow–deformation analysis of dewatering strategies in sheet pile-supported excavations

Mostefa Hani, Mustafa Tuncan, Burak Evirgen, Djamel Ghernaout et al.
Scientific Reports
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Experimental assessment and sequential flow–deformation analysis of dewatering strategies in sheet pile-supported excavations

Mostefa Hani, Mustafa Tuncan, Burak Evirgen, Djamel Ghernaout, Herbert Mukalazi, Yazid Chetbani, Ammar Alnmr, Ahmed Belaadi
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates wellpoint and drain dewatering systems through laboratory experiments and sequentially coupled flow–deformation numerical modeling at full-scale geometry (× 20). A 1/20-scale physical model with sixteen pumping wells and six observation wells monitored groundwater drawdown around a 30 × 30 cm 2 excavation. The internal deep drain (h1) achieved the greatest groundwater reduction and highest vertical base settlement (ratio U v max / U h max = 2.48; 81.8% increase relative to the dry reference), whereas the wellpoint system minimized lateral wall displacement while maintaining moderate uplift ( U v max / U h max = 2.55; 24.6% rate of change), providing balanced internal stress reduction with lower shear and bending forces. Construction sequencing significantly influenced excavation response: pre-dewatering (“dewatering then excavation”) reduced excavation uplift by up to − 283.5% compared with the dry reference, while the global factor of safety remained nearly insensitive (< 0.86% variation). These results indicate that combining the wellpoint system with optimized execution sequencing offers the most effective strategy to control groundwater, limit lateral wall movements, and reduce basal heave in excavations in loose to medium-dense sandy soils.

Scientific Reports
Latakia University (SY), University of Jijel (DZ), University of Ha'il (SA), Eskisehir Technical University (TR), Centre de Recherche sur l'Information Scientifique et Technique (DZ), Kyambogo University (UG), Széchenyi István University (HU), University of Skikda (DZ)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.