Dynamic Quality-of-Life Trajectories After Head and Neck Reconstruction

Importance: Quality of life (QOL) is considered the second most important outcome after survival in cancer care. In head and neck reconstruction, QOL has long been assumed to stabilize at 1 year, an assumption that guides clinical follow-up and trial design. Objective: To evaluate QOL beyond 1 year after head and neck reconstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study of 315 patients with head and neck disease was conducted from 2015 through 2023 at a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan. Data were analyzed March to August 2025. Exposure: Free flap reconstruction. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the physical domain of the University of Wisconsin QOL questionnaire. The primary end point was QOL time to deterioration (TTD), which accounts for reversibility and patient response shift, and to identify modifiable risk factors for deterioration, defined in TTD as a decline of 5 or more points without subsequent recovery of 5 or more points. For Cox proportional hazards models, statistical analysis included hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. The secondary end point was a composite of TTD or death. Results: Among 315 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.8] years; 283 [89.8%] male; median follow-up, 1155 [95% CI, 1056 to 1254] days), baseline Cox models identified Charlson Comorbidity Index as associated with QOL deterioration (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.74). In 12-month landmark models (N = 272), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.06), chemotherapy (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.48), and complications (HR 2.01; 1.21 to 3.34) were associated with QOL deterioration. The composite end point showed similar results. QOL remained dynamic beyond 1 year, with 115 of 192 patients (59.9%) having clinically meaningful score changes between years 1 and 2 (58 of 192 [30.2%] improved, 57 of 192 [29.7%] deteriorated) despite stable cohort mean scores. Findings were consistent in analyses restricted to patients with malignant disease (n = 246). Exploratory baseline and 12-month risk scores demonstrated the feasibility of predicting dynamic QOL changes beyond 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study question the assumption that QOL stabilizes at 1 year after head and neck reconstruction. More than half of patients continued to experience clinically meaningful changes, with complications at 1 year representing the strongest modifiable risk factor for deterioration. Prognostic QOL risk scores provide an approach for targeting survivorship interventions to patients at highest risk for deterioration, shifting the focus from survival alone to preservation of QOL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2026.1584
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Quality-of-Life Trajectories After Head and Neck Reconstruction

You-Yan Chen, Steven J. Lo, Fu-Chan Wei
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Dynamic Quality-of-Life Trajectories After Head and Neck Reconstruction

You-Yan Chen, Steven J. Lo, Fu-Chan Wei
article en

Abstract

Importance: Quality of life (QOL) is considered the second most important outcome after survival in cancer care. In head and neck reconstruction, QOL has long been assumed to stabilize at 1 year, an assumption that guides clinical follow-up and trial design. Objective: To evaluate QOL beyond 1 year after head and neck reconstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study of 315 patients with head and neck disease was conducted from 2015 through 2023 at a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan. Data were analyzed March to August 2025. Exposure: Free flap reconstruction. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the physical domain of the University of Wisconsin QOL questionnaire. The primary end point was QOL time to deterioration (TTD), which accounts for reversibility and patient response shift, and to identify modifiable risk factors for deterioration, defined in TTD as a decline of 5 or more points without subsequent recovery of 5 or more points. For Cox proportional hazards models, statistical analysis included hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. The secondary end point was a composite of TTD or death. Results: Among 315 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.8] years; 283 [89.8%] male; median follow-up, 1155 [95% CI, 1056 to 1254] days), baseline Cox models identified Charlson Comorbidity Index as associated with QOL deterioration (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.74). In 12-month landmark models (N = 272), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.06), chemotherapy (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.48), and complications (HR 2.01; 1.21 to 3.34) were associated with QOL deterioration. The composite end point showed similar results. QOL remained dynamic beyond 1 year, with 115 of 192 patients (59.9%) having clinically meaningful score changes between years 1 and 2 (58 of 192 [30.2%] improved, 57 of 192 [29.7%] deteriorated) despite stable cohort mean scores. Findings were consistent in analyses restricted to patients with malignant disease (n = 246). Exploratory baseline and 12-month risk scores demonstrated the feasibility of predicting dynamic QOL changes beyond 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study question the assumption that QOL stabilizes at 1 year after head and neck reconstruction. More than half of patients continued to experience clinically meaningful changes, with complications at 1 year representing the strongest modifiable risk factor for deterioration. Prognostic QOL risk scores provide an approach for targeting survivorship interventions to patients at highest risk for deterioration, shifting the focus from survival alone to preservation of QOL.

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Chang Gung University (TW), Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.