A Scoping Review of Brownfield Greening: Research Topics, Methods, Trends, and Challenges

Brownfield greening (BG) has become an important approach to addressing urban land scarcity, environmental remediation, and sustainable urban development. This scoping review analysed 116 English-language publications from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The review identified five major research themes: pollution and remediation, regeneration design, brownfield characteristics and greening benefits, planning and decision-making, and stakeholder perceptions. Findings indicate a transition from contamination-focused studies towards integrated approaches emphasising ecological restoration, social values, and multifunctional green infrastructure. Research methods have evolved from qualitative case studies to interdisciplinary approaches involving spatial analysis, ecological modelling, scenario simulation, and participatory methods. Existing studies mainly focus on regenerated sites and site-scale analyses, while contamination and remediation processes are often insufficiently incorporated into planning, design, and ecosystem-service assessments. The review highlights the diverse ecological, social, economic, and cultural benefits generated by BG and identifies key research gaps, including the need to better integrate remediation into regeneration processes, to conduct long-term monitoring, to conduct comparative international studies, and to include evidence from underrepresented regions. Overall, BG is increasingly recognised as a multifunctional strategy for sustainable urban regeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15071132
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scoping Review of Brownfield Greening: Research Topics, Methods, Trends, and Challenges

Yawen Han, Yuanjing Zhang, Luca Maria Francesco Fabris
Land
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
article

A Scoping Review of Brownfield Greening: Research Topics, Methods, Trends, and Challenges

Yawen Han, Yuanjing Zhang, Luca Maria Francesco Fabris
article en

Abstract

Brownfield greening (BG) has become an important approach to addressing urban land scarcity, environmental remediation, and sustainable urban development. This scoping review analysed 116 English-language publications from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The review identified five major research themes: pollution and remediation, regeneration design, brownfield characteristics and greening benefits, planning and decision-making, and stakeholder perceptions. Findings indicate a transition from contamination-focused studies towards integrated approaches emphasising ecological restoration, social values, and multifunctional green infrastructure. Research methods have evolved from qualitative case studies to interdisciplinary approaches involving spatial analysis, ecological modelling, scenario simulation, and participatory methods. Existing studies mainly focus on regenerated sites and site-scale analyses, while contamination and remediation processes are often insufficiently incorporated into planning, design, and ecosystem-service assessments. The review highlights the diverse ecological, social, economic, and cultural benefits generated by BG and identifies key research gaps, including the need to better integrate remediation into regeneration processes, to conduct long-term monitoring, to conduct comparative international studies, and to include evidence from underrepresented regions. Overall, BG is increasingly recognised as a multifunctional strategy for sustainable urban regeneration.

LandVol. 15(7)
Guangdong Urban & Rural Planning and Design Institute (CN), Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (CN), Zhejiang University (CN), Politecnico di Milano (IT), Tsinghua University (CN)
China Scholarship Council, National Social Science Fund of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.