Breast cancer screening in Europe and the role of general practitioners: A 32-country comparative survey.

Introduction Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women, and screening can allow earlier-stage diagnosis. While there are European recommendations on the age-range and frequency of breast cancer screening, participation in these programmes varies substantially, and this could be due to differences in how they are organised and implemented. The role that primary healthcare professionals play in the process is unclear.We aimed to describe the breast cancer screening programmes in European countries and investigate how primary healthcare professionals are involved in this screening process.Methods A cross-sectional survey in 32 countries. Key informants with relevant expertise answered online questions about the characteristics of their screening programmes and general practitioners' (GPs') roles in this. Responses were refined through an iterative consensus process. Data were examined to identify patterns in GP engagement.Results We found important differences between European breast cancer screening systems. While most had population-based screening, four countries relied on opportunistic screening. In 15 countries GPs had little or no involvement in the process of breast cancer screening, and in 13 countries GPs had some involvement, including identifying eligible patients, issuing referrals, and following-up results. Screening uptake rates tended to be higher in countries with well-established population-based screening programmes which give little or no GP involvement. Few countries linked GP engagement to incentives or performance measures.Conclusion Countries with lower screening uptake should consider either enhancing GP involvement or transitioning to a structured, population-based screening system. Further research should explore how best to integrate primary care within national screening strategies.Most European countries rely on population-based breast cancer screening.Screening uptake rates are higher in countries with well-established population-based screening programmes which give little or no GP involvement.Countries with lower screening uptake should consider transitioning to a structured, population-based screening system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/98880
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast cancer screening in Europe and the role of general practitioners: A 32-country comparative survey.

Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Norbert Král, Krzysztof Buczkowski, Lucas Küppers et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Breast cancer screening in Europe and the role of general practitioners: A 32-country comparative survey.

Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Norbert Král, Krzysztof Buczkowski, Lucas Küppers, Roland Kraxner, Aida Puia, Mercè Marzo‐Castillejo, Sherihane Bensemmane, Mette Brekke, Gergana Apostolova, Cecilia Högberg, Ilze Skuja, Didem Kafadar, Marija Zafirovska, Peter Vedsted, Εmmanouil Smyrnakis, Ricardo Zaidan, Nicola Buono, Marika Sulashvili, Anina Pless, Natalia Ponzel, Jelena Danilenko, Xenia Wostmann, Michael Harris, Tuomas Koskela, Rūta Radzevičienė - Jurgutė, Marij Petek Šter, Zlata Ožvačić Adžić, Kristi Särgava, Delphine Legoff, Robert Hoffman, Jako Burgers, Patrick Redmond
article en

Abstract

Introduction Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women, and screening can allow earlier-stage diagnosis. While there are European recommendations on the age-range and frequency of breast cancer screening, participation in these programmes varies substantially, and this could be due to differences in how they are organised and implemented. The role that primary healthcare professionals play in the process is unclear.We aimed to describe the breast cancer screening programmes in European countries and investigate how primary healthcare professionals are involved in this screening process.Methods A cross-sectional survey in 32 countries. Key informants with relevant expertise answered online questions about the characteristics of their screening programmes and general practitioners' (GPs') roles in this. Responses were refined through an iterative consensus process. Data were examined to identify patterns in GP engagement.Results We found important differences between European breast cancer screening systems. While most had population-based screening, four countries relied on opportunistic screening. In 15 countries GPs had little or no involvement in the process of breast cancer screening, and in 13 countries GPs had some involvement, including identifying eligible patients, issuing referrals, and following-up results. Screening uptake rates tended to be higher in countries with well-established population-based screening programmes which give little or no GP involvement. Few countries linked GP engagement to incentives or performance measures.Conclusion Countries with lower screening uptake should consider either enhancing GP involvement or transitioning to a structured, population-based screening system. Further research should explore how best to integrate primary care within national screening strategies.Most European countries rely on population-based breast cancer screening.Screening uptake rates are higher in countries with well-established population-based screening programmes which give little or no GP involvement.Countries with lower screening uptake should consider transitioning to a structured, population-based screening system.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Bern (CH), Primary Health Care (QA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.