Healthcare professionals' perceptions of decision-making for older patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

Decision-making about systemic therapy in older adults with cancer is complex due to frailty, clinical uncertainty, and competing treatment goals. Limited evidence exists synthesizing how healthcare professionals support decision-making in geriatric oncology. This qualitative systematic review searched four databases through November 2025 and conducted citation tracking. Thematic synthesis was performed, and confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research). Twelve studies involving 212 healthcare professionals were included. Two analytical and six descriptive themes were identified. Healthcare professionals sought to minimize treatment-related harm while respecting patients' values and life perspectives. Decision-making was shaped by clinical judgment integrating geriatric assessment findings, healthcare professionals' perspectives, ethical considerations regarding beneficence and autonomy, and structural factors such as resource limitations and interprofessional collaboration. These findings highlight the need for clinical expertise, collaboration across oncology, primary care, and geriatric care providers, and system-level support for geriatric-informed care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.26.0051
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of decision-making for older patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

Kengo Hirayama, Moe Nemoto, Sunka Kim, Honoka Tsumura
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of decision-making for older patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

Kengo Hirayama, Moe Nemoto, Sunka Kim, Honoka Tsumura
article en

Abstract

Decision-making about systemic therapy in older adults with cancer is complex due to frailty, clinical uncertainty, and competing treatment goals. Limited evidence exists synthesizing how healthcare professionals support decision-making in geriatric oncology. This qualitative systematic review searched four databases through November 2025 and conducted citation tracking. Thematic synthesis was performed, and confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research). Twelve studies involving 212 healthcare professionals were included. Two analytical and six descriptive themes were identified. Healthcare professionals sought to minimize treatment-related harm while respecting patients' values and life perspectives. Decision-making was shaped by clinical judgment integrating geriatric assessment findings, healthcare professionals' perspectives, ethical considerations regarding beneficence and autonomy, and structural factors such as resource limitations and interprofessional collaboration. These findings highlight the need for clinical expertise, collaboration across oncology, primary care, and geriatric care providers, and system-level support for geriatric-informed care.

Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Sapporo City University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Sapporo Kosei General Hospital (JP), Hokkaido University Hospital (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.