Patient and Technology Selection for Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Focal therapy is emerging as an organ-preserving strategy for selected patients with localized prostate cancer, aiming to preserve urinary and sexual function while maintaining acceptable cancer control. However, patient and technology selection remain complex because prostate cancer is often multifocal, clinically significant lesions may be missed by imaging or biopsy, and long-term comparative oncological data are limited. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and consensus recommendations on oncological suitability, histopathological risk features, tumor burden, imaging assessment, anatomical considerations, functional priorities, and follow-up. We also discuss the complementary roles of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography, micro-ultrasound, and artificial intelligence-assisted planning. Finally, we review how tumor location and proximity to critical structures guide selection among high-intensity focused ultrasound, cryotherapy, irreversible electroporation, transurethral ultrasound ablation, laser ablation, and photodynamic therapy. Focal therapy remains promising but requires careful selection, shared decision-making, and structured follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18132070
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and Technology Selection for Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Mustafa Dinçkal, Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa, Julio M. Pow‐Sang, Alice Yu
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Patient and Technology Selection for Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Mustafa Dinçkal, Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa, Julio M. Pow‐Sang, Alice Yu
article en

Abstract

Focal therapy is emerging as an organ-preserving strategy for selected patients with localized prostate cancer, aiming to preserve urinary and sexual function while maintaining acceptable cancer control. However, patient and technology selection remain complex because prostate cancer is often multifocal, clinically significant lesions may be missed by imaging or biopsy, and long-term comparative oncological data are limited. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and consensus recommendations on oncological suitability, histopathological risk features, tumor burden, imaging assessment, anatomical considerations, functional priorities, and follow-up. We also discuss the complementary roles of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography, micro-ultrasound, and artificial intelligence-assisted planning. Finally, we review how tumor location and proximity to critical structures guide selection among high-intensity focused ultrasound, cryotherapy, irreversible electroporation, transurethral ultrasound ablation, laser ablation, and photodynamic therapy. Focal therapy remains promising but requires careful selection, shared decision-making, and structured follow-up.

CancersVol. 18(13)
Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Sivas State Hospital (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.