A cognitive analysis of water pollution in the South African DBE NSC Geography examinations, 2021–2025

South Africa’s water pollution crisis is severe, yet the cognitive demand of NSC Geography questions on this topic has not been systematically examined. The study employs qualitative content analysis of question papers and official marking guidelines to compare intended cognitive demand with the demand actually required to earn marks. Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy as the analytical framework, it analyses how water pollution is articulated across the Geography FET CAPS curriculum, Examination Guidelines, and DBE NSC Geography November papers and its MGs (2021–2025). Findings reveal a misalignment: higher-order verbs in question papers are consistently reduced to recall-based checklists by the MGs. Furthermore, the examination materials frame water pollution in depoliticized, technocratic terms that omit governance failures and constitutional rights. No question across the 5‑year corpus required learners to evaluate municipal collapse or engage with the constitutional dimensions of the crisis. The study concludes that the NSC Geography assessment denies learners the powerful knowledge required for water pollution literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Geographical Journal
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2026.2690049
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cognitive analysis of water pollution in the South African DBE NSC Geography examinations, 2021–2025

Shaylen Naidoo
South African Geographical Journal
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

A cognitive analysis of water pollution in the South African DBE NSC Geography examinations, 2021–2025

Shaylen Naidoo
article en

Abstract

South Africa’s water pollution crisis is severe, yet the cognitive demand of NSC Geography questions on this topic has not been systematically examined. The study employs qualitative content analysis of question papers and official marking guidelines to compare intended cognitive demand with the demand actually required to earn marks. Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy as the analytical framework, it analyses how water pollution is articulated across the Geography FET CAPS curriculum, Examination Guidelines, and DBE NSC Geography November papers and its MGs (2021–2025). Findings reveal a misalignment: higher-order verbs in question papers are consistently reduced to recall-based checklists by the MGs. Furthermore, the examination materials frame water pollution in depoliticized, technocratic terms that omit governance failures and constitutional rights. No question across the 5‑year corpus required learners to evaluate municipal collapse or engage with the constitutional dimensions of the crisis. The study concludes that the NSC Geography assessment denies learners the powerful knowledge required for water pollution literacy.

South African Geographical JournalVol. 108(1)
Mandela Institute for Development Studies (ZA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.