Self-governance, social order and institutional solutions to collective action in a Tent city

Applying insights from the theory of collective action in self-governance, this paper addresses how a city-sanctioned homeless camp has successfully self-governed for over two decades. Based on a club goods model and democratic practices, this tent city attains social order and provides numerous collective benefits to its residents, who initially bring very little capital to the camp. Our case study, which includes in-depth interviews with residents of a tent city at four time points between 2012-2025, as well as observations from their weekly organizational meeting, illustrates how the possibility of exclusion for rule violation, norms emphasizing voice and service, and democratic governance combine to make the community viable. In addition, the evidence shows, rather than merely enabling collective action, that collective identity, social capital and personal agency are emergent features of self-governance that enhance and reinforce its benefits for residents. Finally, we discuss the limitations of self-governance as a solution to homelessness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rationality and Society
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631261464114
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-governance, social order and institutional solutions to collective action in a Tent city

Jennifer McKinney, Karen A. Snedker, Steven Pfaff
Rationality and Society
Social Capital and Networks
article

Self-governance, social order and institutional solutions to collective action in a Tent city

Jennifer McKinney, Karen A. Snedker, Steven Pfaff
article en

Abstract

Applying insights from the theory of collective action in self-governance, this paper addresses how a city-sanctioned homeless camp has successfully self-governed for over two decades. Based on a club goods model and democratic practices, this tent city attains social order and provides numerous collective benefits to its residents, who initially bring very little capital to the camp. Our case study, which includes in-depth interviews with residents of a tent city at four time points between 2012-2025, as well as observations from their weekly organizational meeting, illustrates how the possibility of exclusion for rule violation, norms emphasizing voice and service, and democratic governance combine to make the community viable. In addition, the evidence shows, rather than merely enabling collective action, that collective identity, social capital and personal agency are emergent features of self-governance that enhance and reinforce its benefits for residents. Finally, we discuss the limitations of self-governance as a solution to homelessness.

Rationality and Society
Seattle Pacific University (US), Chapman University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.