From Poka-Yoke to Decision Stability: Why AI-Supported Decision Architectures Require Diagnostic Methods Beyond Traditional Quality Assurance

Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded into operational decision processes where correctness alone may no longer provide sufficient governance evidence. Building on principles from Lean Manufacturing, system safety, and emerging AI governance research, this paper introduces Decision Stability as a conceptual framework for understanding how AI-supported decision architectures behave under operational uncertainty. Rather than focusing solely on correctness, compliance, or model performance, the paper argues that future governance capabilities may increasingly depend on the stability, observability, and governability of decision architectures. Replay-based governance diagnostics are discussed as one possible architectural response for making emerging instability observable before visible operational failures occur. The paper is conceptual and proposes a research agenda for empirical validation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20840157
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Poka-Yoke to Decision Stability: Why AI-Supported Decision Architectures Require Diagnostic Methods Beyond Traditional Quality Assurance

Markus Dören
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

From Poka-Yoke to Decision Stability: Why AI-Supported Decision Architectures Require Diagnostic Methods Beyond Traditional Quality Assurance

Markus Dören
preprint en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded into operational decision processes where correctness alone may no longer provide sufficient governance evidence. Building on principles from Lean Manufacturing, system safety, and emerging AI governance research, this paper introduces Decision Stability as a conceptual framework for understanding how AI-supported decision architectures behave under operational uncertainty. Rather than focusing solely on correctness, compliance, or model performance, the paper argues that future governance capabilities may increasingly depend on the stability, observability, and governability of decision architectures. Replay-based governance diagnostics are discussed as one possible architectural response for making emerging instability observable before visible operational failures occur. The paper is conceptual and proposes a research agenda for empirical validation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.