Efficacy of codesigned COVID-19 booster vaccine promotion materials for long-term care staff: a cluster-randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Among health care workers, long-term care center (LTCC) staff are among the most hesitant to obtain COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of enhanced usual care (EUC) to codesigned materials (Codesign) in increasing COVID-19 booster vaccination rates and willingness to promote the booster among long term care center (LTCC) staff. METHODS: We conducted a two-arm cluster-randomized trial in 40 LTCCs in Georgia (n = 21) and Washington (n = 19) from August 2021 to December 2023. EUC LTCCs distributed standard government COVID-19 booster promotion materials. LTCCs in the Codesign arm allowed staff to participate in virtual codesign teams. Over 10 weekly meetings, the teams developed tailored COVID-19 booster promotion materials. Materials were distributed to both arms in January 2023. Primary outcomes were LTCC-level COVID-19 booster vaccination and a Net Promoter Score (NPS) measuring booster promotion to coworkers. Secondary outcomes included staff-level vaccine hesitancy and confidence scores and booster promotion to friends and family. RESULTS: We did not detect a significant difference between the EUC and Codesign arms in COVID-19 booster rates or primary NPS measure. Similarly, secondary and exploratory outcomes were not significantly different between either arm. CONCLUSIONS: The null findings of this trial are consistent with the challenges of other clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccine-promotion interventions in improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake among LTCC staff. Lessons for future research include identifying better ways to: (1) engage leaders and staff, (2) design more effective targeting messages, and (3) develop ways to target and customize dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. CLINICALTRIALS: gov #NCT05449418. Date of registration: 6/22/2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28069-7
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of codesigned COVID-19 booster vaccine promotion materials for long-term care staff: a cluster-randomized trial

Annalisa V. Piccorelli, Jaclyn Volney, Kimberly C. Arthur, Clarissa Hsu et al.
BMC Public Health
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Efficacy of codesigned COVID-19 booster vaccine promotion materials for long-term care staff: a cluster-randomized trial

Annalisa V. Piccorelli, Jaclyn Volney, Kimberly C. Arthur, Clarissa Hsu, Kanetha B. Wilson, Ahoua Koné, Lauren Nisotel, Breana Berry, Bennett McDonald, Brian D. Williamson, Marla Becker, Margaret Gachuiri, Brianna Binion, Courtney McCracken, Beverly B. Green, Kirsten Senturia, Alphonse Derus, Kelly Hansen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among health care workers, long-term care center (LTCC) staff are among the most hesitant to obtain COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of enhanced usual care (EUC) to codesigned materials (Codesign) in increasing COVID-19 booster vaccination rates and willingness to promote the booster among long term care center (LTCC) staff. METHODS: We conducted a two-arm cluster-randomized trial in 40 LTCCs in Georgia (n = 21) and Washington (n = 19) from August 2021 to December 2023. EUC LTCCs distributed standard government COVID-19 booster promotion materials. LTCCs in the Codesign arm allowed staff to participate in virtual codesign teams. Over 10 weekly meetings, the teams developed tailored COVID-19 booster promotion materials. Materials were distributed to both arms in January 2023. Primary outcomes were LTCC-level COVID-19 booster vaccination and a Net Promoter Score (NPS) measuring booster promotion to coworkers. Secondary outcomes included staff-level vaccine hesitancy and confidence scores and booster promotion to friends and family. RESULTS: We did not detect a significant difference between the EUC and Codesign arms in COVID-19 booster rates or primary NPS measure. Similarly, secondary and exploratory outcomes were not significantly different between either arm. CONCLUSIONS: The null findings of this trial are consistent with the challenges of other clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccine-promotion interventions in improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake among LTCC staff. Lessons for future research include identifying better ways to: (1) engage leaders and staff, (2) design more effective targeting messages, and (3) develop ways to target and customize dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. CLINICALTRIALS: gov #NCT05449418. Date of registration: 6/22/2022.

BMC Public Health
Washington State Department of Health (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), University of Washington (US), Piedmont Atlanta Hospital (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (US), Mercer Island School District (US), University of Washington Tacoma (US), Walden University (US)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.