Neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms associated with immersive virtual reality-induced hypoalgesia: a systematic review

ABSTRACT: Although growing evidence supports immersive virtual reality (IVR) as a nonpharmacological intervention for pain management, the mechanisms by which IVR induces hypoalgesia are still under debate. In this study, we review and evaluate candidate neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying IVR-induced hypoalgesia and their experimental evidence. A preregistered systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing the databases Web of Science, Medline (through PubMed), SCOPUS, and APA PsycINFO. A total of 28 studies were included, involving 1142 participants (673 women [59%]). Of these, 78 (6.8%) experienced acute pain, 171 (15%) chronic pain, and 869 (76%) were exposed to experimental pain inductions. Risk-of-bias assessment ranged from low (n = 1; 3.5%), with some concerns (n = 16; 57.1%), to high (n = 11; 39.3%). The overall quality of studies ranged from fair (n = 6; 21.5%) to good (n = 21; 75%) to excellent (n = 1; 3.5%). Our synthesis suggests that IVR-induced hypoalgesia correlates with increased brain activity, specifically in nuclei implicated in descending pain modulation, and altered autonomic responses, specifically enhanced parasympathetic system activity. Similarly, IVR-induced hypoalgesia is associated with changes in psychophysical pain tests, such as increased pain tolerance and/or thresholds. However, caution is warranted when interpreting these results, as 89.3% of the studies assessed only the immediate effects of a single IVR session, and intervention protocols were highly heterogeneous. Furthermore, most studies tested pain-free subjects using experimentally induced pain (n = 20), limiting extrapolation to clinical populations. We conclude that experimental designs allowing causal inference-ideally through mediation analyses-are currently lacking and urgently needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying IVR-induced hypoalgesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004049
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms associated with immersive virtual reality-induced hypoalgesia: a systematic review

Enrique Velasco, Ann Meulders, Tasha R. Stanton, Marta Matamala-Gomez et al.
Pain
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms associated with immersive virtual reality-induced hypoalgesia: a systematic review

Enrique Velasco, Ann Meulders, Tasha R. Stanton, Marta Matamala-Gomez, Mar Flores-Cortés, Roy La Touche, Lucas Mamud-Meroni, Germán E. Tarcaya, Javier Guerra-Armas
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Although growing evidence supports immersive virtual reality (IVR) as a nonpharmacological intervention for pain management, the mechanisms by which IVR induces hypoalgesia are still under debate. In this study, we review and evaluate candidate neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying IVR-induced hypoalgesia and their experimental evidence. A preregistered systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing the databases Web of Science, Medline (through PubMed), SCOPUS, and APA PsycINFO. A total of 28 studies were included, involving 1142 participants (673 women [59%]). Of these, 78 (6.8%) experienced acute pain, 171 (15%) chronic pain, and 869 (76%) were exposed to experimental pain inductions. Risk-of-bias assessment ranged from low (n = 1; 3.5%), with some concerns (n = 16; 57.1%), to high (n = 11; 39.3%). The overall quality of studies ranged from fair (n = 6; 21.5%) to good (n = 21; 75%) to excellent (n = 1; 3.5%). Our synthesis suggests that IVR-induced hypoalgesia correlates with increased brain activity, specifically in nuclei implicated in descending pain modulation, and altered autonomic responses, specifically enhanced parasympathetic system activity. Similarly, IVR-induced hypoalgesia is associated with changes in psychophysical pain tests, such as increased pain tolerance and/or thresholds. However, caution is warranted when interpreting these results, as 89.3% of the studies assessed only the immediate effects of a single IVR session, and intervention protocols were highly heterogeneous. Furthermore, most studies tested pain-free subjects using experimentally induced pain (n = 20), limiting extrapolation to clinical populations. We conclude that experimental designs allowing causal inference-ideally through mediation analyses-are currently lacking and urgently needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying IVR-induced hypoalgesia.

Pain
University of South Australia (AU), Universidad de Flores (AR), Maastricht University (NL), Universidad Fernando Pessoa Canarias (ES), Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (ES), INDCRAN (ES), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE), The University of Adelaide (AU), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES), KU Leuven (BE)
FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.