Common maritime security policy in the GCC: revisiting the challenges in the wake of the Red Sea crisis

The regionalization of the October 2023 conflict as a result of the Houthi attacks on commercial shipping at the entrance to the Red Sea created global ramifications, resulting in international intervention. While the crisis was also a reminder of the importance of maritime security to the GCC countries, they have neither adopted a collective response nor joined the international coalition. They have opted for unilateral responses to protect their interests. This was conspicuous, since securing Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs) in the vicinity of the Arabian peninsula remains essential to the security and global economic engagement of the GCC states. This article argues that the lack of a collective response by the GCC states to the maritime security dilemmas in the Red Sea partially indicates divergent views on the crisis, and reflects the current security orientation of each. More to the point, at the root of their ad hoc and unilateral responses lies the long-standing inability to devise a common maritime security strategy. Thus, the paper studies five major factors that present major impediments to the adoption of a common maritime security policy at the GCC level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle Eastern Studies
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2026.2689438
Primary Topic
Maritime Security and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common maritime security policy in the GCC: revisiting the challenges in the wake of the Red Sea crisis

Şaban Kardaş, Said Albimani
Middle Eastern Studies
Maritime Security and History
article

Common maritime security policy in the GCC: revisiting the challenges in the wake of the Red Sea crisis

Şaban Kardaş, Said Albimani
article en

Abstract

The regionalization of the October 2023 conflict as a result of the Houthi attacks on commercial shipping at the entrance to the Red Sea created global ramifications, resulting in international intervention. While the crisis was also a reminder of the importance of maritime security to the GCC countries, they have neither adopted a collective response nor joined the international coalition. They have opted for unilateral responses to protect their interests. This was conspicuous, since securing Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs) in the vicinity of the Arabian peninsula remains essential to the security and global economic engagement of the GCC states. This article argues that the lack of a collective response by the GCC states to the maritime security dilemmas in the Red Sea partially indicates divergent views on the crisis, and reflects the current security orientation of each. More to the point, at the root of their ad hoc and unilateral responses lies the long-standing inability to devise a common maritime security strategy. Thus, the paper studies five major factors that present major impediments to the adoption of a common maritime security policy at the GCC level.

Middle Eastern Studies
Gulf English School (QA)
Qatar National Library
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Maritime Security and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Common maritime security policy in the GCC: revisiting the challenges in the wake of the Red Sea crisis — Şaban Kardaş, Said Albimani · Middle Eastern Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS