What Changed in Post-Earthquake Reinforced Concrete Damage in Türkiye? A Comparative Study from 1992 (Erzincan) to 2023 (Malatya)

This study presents a damage-based comparative assessment of reinforced concrete buildings affected by the 1992 Erzincan earthquake (Mw 6.8) and the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence (Pazarcık, Mw 7.7; Elbistan, Mw 7.6), two destructive earthquake events in Türkiye separated by nearly three decades. A distinctive contribution of the study is the presentation of original color photographs from the 1992 Erzincan earthquake, systematically documented and comparatively evaluated for the first time and directly compared with post-earthquake field observations from Malatya following the 2023 earthquake sequence. To complement the field-based evidence, representative strong ground motion records from both earthquake events were processed and compared using standard seismic intensity and spectral response parameters. The spectral evaluation indicates that the 1992 Erzincan ground motion and the 2023 Elbistan-related motion recorded in Malatya imposed comparable seismic demands relevant to typical reinforced concrete buildings, thereby providing a rational basis for cross-event damage interpretation. Despite substantial advances in Turkish seismic design codes, recurrent damage mechanisms were observed in both building stocks, particularly soft-story formation, short-column effects, inadequate transverse reinforcement, poor beam–column joint performance, and deficiencies in material quality and detailing. The findings demonstrate that seismic safety cannot be improved through code development alone unless design provisions are consistently translated into construction quality, detailing practice, inspection, and field implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16132525
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Changed in Post-Earthquake Reinforced Concrete Damage in Türkiye? A Comparative Study from 1992 (Erzincan) to 2023 (Malatya)

Ahmet İhsan Turan, Alper Çelik
Buildings
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

What Changed in Post-Earthquake Reinforced Concrete Damage in Türkiye? A Comparative Study from 1992 (Erzincan) to 2023 (Malatya)

Ahmet İhsan Turan, Alper Çelik
article en

Abstract

This study presents a damage-based comparative assessment of reinforced concrete buildings affected by the 1992 Erzincan earthquake (Mw 6.8) and the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence (Pazarcık, Mw 7.7; Elbistan, Mw 7.6), two destructive earthquake events in Türkiye separated by nearly three decades. A distinctive contribution of the study is the presentation of original color photographs from the 1992 Erzincan earthquake, systematically documented and comparatively evaluated for the first time and directly compared with post-earthquake field observations from Malatya following the 2023 earthquake sequence. To complement the field-based evidence, representative strong ground motion records from both earthquake events were processed and compared using standard seismic intensity and spectral response parameters. The spectral evaluation indicates that the 1992 Erzincan ground motion and the 2023 Elbistan-related motion recorded in Malatya imposed comparable seismic demands relevant to typical reinforced concrete buildings, thereby providing a rational basis for cross-event damage interpretation. Despite substantial advances in Turkish seismic design codes, recurrent damage mechanisms were observed in both building stocks, particularly soft-story formation, short-column effects, inadequate transverse reinforcement, poor beam–column joint performance, and deficiencies in material quality and detailing. The findings demonstrate that seismic safety cannot be improved through code development alone unless design provisions are consistently translated into construction quality, detailing practice, inspection, and field implementation.

BuildingsVol. 16(13)
Ankara University (TR), Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.