Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Fluoride Retention according to Fluoride Varnish Application Dose: Pilot Study

Background: This study aimed to compare salivary fluoride retention following different fluoride varnish (FV) application doses in vivo to determine the optimal dosage.Methods: We conducted a crossover clinical study involving nine healthy adult participants.Two doses (0.4 g and 0.2 g) of MI Varnish TM (5% sodium fluoride, 22,600 ppm fluoride; GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) were applied intraorally.Saliva samples were collected at baseline and at 1, 4, 20, and 72 hours post-application via a distilled-water mouth-rinse method.Salivary fluoride concentrations were measured using an ion-selective electrode.Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Results: Although salivary fluoride concentrations in the 0.4 g group were 1.53 fold and 2.16 fold higher than those in the 0.2 g group at 1 and 4 hours post-application, respectively, this difference reached statistical significance only at the 4 hour mark (p< 0.05).Fluoride concentrations in both groups decreased markedly by 20 hours and returned to near-baseline levels at 72 hours.No significant differences between the groups were observed at these later time points.Conclusion: Although the higher FV dose resulted in increased short-term salivary fluoride retention, no significant differences in long-term retention were observed between the two doses.These findings suggest that a reduced FV dose (0.2 g) can adequately maintain long-term fluoride retention while minimizing unnecessary fluoride exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of dental hygiene science
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2026.26.2.134
Primary Topic
Fluoride Effects and Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Fluoride Retention according to Fluoride Varnish Application Dose: Pilot Study

Ji-Soo Kim
Journal of dental hygiene science
Fluoride Effects and Removal
article

Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Fluoride Retention according to Fluoride Varnish Application Dose: Pilot Study

Ji-Soo Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare salivary fluoride retention following different fluoride varnish (FV) application doses in vivo to determine the optimal dosage.Methods: We conducted a crossover clinical study involving nine healthy adult participants.Two doses (0.4 g and 0.2 g) of MI Varnish TM (5% sodium fluoride, 22,600 ppm fluoride; GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) were applied intraorally.Saliva samples were collected at baseline and at 1, 4, 20, and 72 hours post-application via a distilled-water mouth-rinse method.Salivary fluoride concentrations were measured using an ion-selective electrode.Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Results: Although salivary fluoride concentrations in the 0.4 g group were 1.53 fold and 2.16 fold higher than those in the 0.2 g group at 1 and 4 hours post-application, respectively, this difference reached statistical significance only at the 4 hour mark (p< 0.05).Fluoride concentrations in both groups decreased markedly by 20 hours and returned to near-baseline levels at 72 hours.No significant differences between the groups were observed at these later time points.Conclusion: Although the higher FV dose resulted in increased short-term salivary fluoride retention, no significant differences in long-term retention were observed between the two doses.These findings suggest that a reduced FV dose (0.2 g) can adequately maintain long-term fluoride retention while minimizing unnecessary fluoride exposure.

Journal of dental hygiene scienceVol. 26(2)
Youngsan University (KR)
Youngsan University
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fluoride Effects and Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.