Imaging-Based Risk Stratification of IPMN Using a Structured Imaging Score: A Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study

Background/Objectives: Accurate risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) remains clinically challenging. This study evaluates a structured imaging-based scoring approach for IPMN risk stratification, referred to as the Tübingen Dignity Score (TDS), and compares its diagnostic performance with established methods. Methods: In this retrospective study, imaging findings from patients with suspected IPMN were analyzed using MRI, CT, and ultrasound. The TDS was applied as an imaging-based scoring system. Diagnostic performance was assessed in a histopathological subset and compared with MRI-based assessment and Fukuoka criteria. Results: MRI showed high sensitivity (94.4%) but limited specificity (57.1%). Fukuoka criteria showed high sensitivity (100%) and high specificity (91.3%) in this cohort, although with a lower positive predictive value. In contrast, the TDS showed high specificity (100%) and positive predictive value, but lower sensitivity (40%), reflecting a different diagnostic profile. These findings indicate a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity across the evaluated approaches. However, the limited number of malignant cases limits the robustness and generalizability of these estimates. Conclusions: The TDS may serve as a complementary, imaging-based tool within a multimodal diagnostic framework for IPMN. Its potential value lies in supporting clinical decision-making in selected cases, particularly where established criteria yield inconclusive results. Given the limited sample size, retrospective single-center design, and exploratory nature of this study, external prospective multicenter validation is required before routine clinical application can be recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33070383
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imaging-Based Risk Stratification of IPMN Using a Structured Imaging Score: A Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study

Stefano Fusco, Sabrina Groß, Nisar P. Malek, Tatjana Hoffmann et al.
Current Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Imaging-Based Risk Stratification of IPMN Using a Structured Imaging Score: A Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study

Stefano Fusco, Sabrina Groß, Nisar P. Malek, Tatjana Hoffmann, Eckhart Froehlich, Hannes F. Digomann
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) remains clinically challenging. This study evaluates a structured imaging-based scoring approach for IPMN risk stratification, referred to as the Tübingen Dignity Score (TDS), and compares its diagnostic performance with established methods. Methods: In this retrospective study, imaging findings from patients with suspected IPMN were analyzed using MRI, CT, and ultrasound. The TDS was applied as an imaging-based scoring system. Diagnostic performance was assessed in a histopathological subset and compared with MRI-based assessment and Fukuoka criteria. Results: MRI showed high sensitivity (94.4%) but limited specificity (57.1%). Fukuoka criteria showed high sensitivity (100%) and high specificity (91.3%) in this cohort, although with a lower positive predictive value. In contrast, the TDS showed high specificity (100%) and positive predictive value, but lower sensitivity (40%), reflecting a different diagnostic profile. These findings indicate a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity across the evaluated approaches. However, the limited number of malignant cases limits the robustness and generalizability of these estimates. Conclusions: The TDS may serve as a complementary, imaging-based tool within a multimodal diagnostic framework for IPMN. Its potential value lies in supporting clinical decision-making in selected cases, particularly where established criteria yield inconclusive results. Given the limited sample size, retrospective single-center design, and exploratory nature of this study, external prospective multicenter validation is required before routine clinical application can be recommended.

Current OncologyVol. 33(7)
ZF Friedrichshafen (Germany) (DE), Marienhospital Stuttgart (DE), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.