Reforming Medicare Payment for Skin Substitutes — Ripping Off the Bandage

Abstract In January 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented a major overhaul of Medicare reimbursement for skin substitutes in an effort to curb runaway spending. Between 2019-2024, annual Medicare Part B spending on these products increased more than 40-fold, from $250 million to >$10 billion. Prior to the recent reform, CMS reimbursed clinicians for skin substitutes administered in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices and patient homes) at rate of average sales price +6% at the average sales price (ASP) plus 6%. However, skin substitute manufacturers were. ally omitted from federal ASP reporting requirements. Some manufacturers and clinicians exploited this exemption to enter spread pricing arrangements, whereby clinicians profited on substantial differences between Medicare reimbursement (calculated based on undiscounted list prices) and actual acquisition costs. The newly implemented payment policy eliminates the potential for spread pricing by setting a flat, site-neutral payment rate. In 2027, CMS intends to establish a 3-tiered payment system for skin substitute products based on US Food and Drug Administration regulatory classification. While these reforms represent a critical step forward, additional measures—such as bundled reimbursement, expanded prior authorization, and evidence-based coverage policies—may be necessary to ensure sustainable and effective wound care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag164
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforming Medicare Payment for Skin Substitutes — Ripping Off the Bandage

Sanket S. Dhruva, Vinay K. Rathi, Joseph S. Ross, Xiaodan Hu et al.
Health Affairs Scholar
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Reforming Medicare Payment for Skin Substitutes — Ripping Off the Bandage

Sanket S. Dhruva, Vinay K. Rathi, Joseph S. Ross, Xiaodan Hu, Jad F Zeitouni
article en

Abstract

Abstract In January 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented a major overhaul of Medicare reimbursement for skin substitutes in an effort to curb runaway spending. Between 2019-2024, annual Medicare Part B spending on these products increased more than 40-fold, from $250 million to >$10 billion. Prior to the recent reform, CMS reimbursed clinicians for skin substitutes administered in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices and patient homes) at rate of average sales price +6% at the average sales price (ASP) plus 6%. However, skin substitute manufacturers were. ally omitted from federal ASP reporting requirements. Some manufacturers and clinicians exploited this exemption to enter spread pricing arrangements, whereby clinicians profited on substantial differences between Medicare reimbursement (calculated based on undiscounted list prices) and actual acquisition costs. The newly implemented payment policy eliminates the potential for spread pricing by setting a flat, site-neutral payment rate. In 2027, CMS intends to establish a 3-tiered payment system for skin substitute products based on US Food and Drug Administration regulatory classification. While these reforms represent a critical step forward, additional measures—such as bundled reimbursement, expanded prior authorization, and evidence-based coverage policies—may be necessary to ensure sustainable and effective wound care.

Health Affairs Scholar
Texas Tech University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Yale University (US), Center for Innovation (US), The Ohio State University (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.