Navigating Ethical Complexities in Qualitative Research With Interrelated Persons

This paper explores ethical complexities in qualitative research involving families/interrelated persons. Such research requires consideration of relational dynamics, informed consent, and methodological choices to avoid unintended harm to relationships. Drawing on research experiences across diverse clinical contexts, the authors reflect on ethical challenges encountered in family interviews, integrating established ethical frameworks with practical insights from joint and family interviews. Key considerations include: clarifying research objectives, distinguishing research interviews from therapeutic encounters; informed consent as an ongoing process, particularly with vulnerable populations; managing confidentiality and withdrawal in relational settings; attending to verbal and nonverbal cues to balance participant voices; maintaining professional boundaries while recognizing unintended therapeutic effects; sensitivity to interview location and group composition; and relational hierarchies. Ethical dilemmas in family-centered qualitative research are context-dependent and require reflexivity, empathy, and deliberate planning. By anticipating challenges and adopting flexible, participant-centered strategies, researchers can generate meaningful data while safeguarding respect for persons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Nursing
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407261459019
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Ethical Complexities in Qualitative Research With Interrelated Persons

Ellen Boldrup Tingleff, Barbara Voltelen, Annemarie Ginnerup Toubøl, Ann E. E. Johansson et al.
Journal of Family Nursing
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Navigating Ethical Complexities in Qualitative Research With Interrelated Persons

Ellen Boldrup Tingleff, Barbara Voltelen, Annemarie Ginnerup Toubøl, Ann E. E. Johansson, Laila M. Busted
article en

Abstract

This paper explores ethical complexities in qualitative research involving families/interrelated persons. Such research requires consideration of relational dynamics, informed consent, and methodological choices to avoid unintended harm to relationships. Drawing on research experiences across diverse clinical contexts, the authors reflect on ethical challenges encountered in family interviews, integrating established ethical frameworks with practical insights from joint and family interviews. Key considerations include: clarifying research objectives, distinguishing research interviews from therapeutic encounters; informed consent as an ongoing process, particularly with vulnerable populations; managing confidentiality and withdrawal in relational settings; attending to verbal and nonverbal cues to balance participant voices; maintaining professional boundaries while recognizing unintended therapeutic effects; sensitivity to interview location and group composition; and relational hierarchies. Ethical dilemmas in family-centered qualitative research are context-dependent and require reflexivity, empathy, and deliberate planning. By anticipating challenges and adopting flexible, participant-centered strategies, researchers can generate meaningful data while safeguarding respect for persons.

Journal of Family Nursing
University of Southern Denmark (DK), University College Lillebaelt (DK), Mental Health Services (DK), Region of Southern Denmark (DK), Regionshospitalet Herning (DK), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.