Personal vs professional HPV vaccination and screening among female healthcare workers in China

Background Female healthcare workers (FHCWs) play a key role in promoting HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening, yet their own preventive behaviors may not align with their professional recommendations. This study aimed to assess the dissociation between personal uptake and professional promotion of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening among FHCWs in China. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 7149 FHCWs in gynecology and obstetrics across 31 provinces in China in 2024. A unified Bayesian network simultaneously modeled four outcomes: own HPV vaccination, own cervical cancer screening within 3 years, and recommendation of vaccination and screening to patients. Bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates) and conditional independence tests assessed the stability and significance of each predictor. Results Among 7149 FHCWs, 45.3% were vaccinated, 80.8% had been screened within 3 years, 75.2% recommended vaccination to patients, and 83.1% recommended screening to patients. For personal behavior, age was the sole direct parent (100% bootstrap; p < 10 −148 ). For recommendation behavior, profession was directly associated with vaccination recommendation (100% bootstrap; p < 10 −84 ) and screening recommendation (86.0% bootstrap; p < 10 −71 ); physicians recommended vaccination to 87.2% of patients versus 67.6% for nurses ( p < 10 −78 ), despite similar personal vaccination rates (43.8% vs 46.2%; p = 0.052). HPV knowledge was associated with vaccination recommendation (86.9% bootstrap; p < 10 −16 ) but not personal vaccination (36.1% bootstrap). Cervical cancer risk factor knowledge was associated with screening recommendation (83.4% bootstrap; p < 10 −34 ). Conclusion Knowledge and profession were associated with what FHCWs recommend to patients but were not associated with their own vaccination or screening. Increasing FHCW vaccination requires structural interventions. Increasing patient uptake requires improving knowledge and recommendation practices among FHCWs, particularly nurses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128879
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal vs professional HPV vaccination and screening among female healthcare workers in China

Chenyang Pei, Hua Yang, Xiang Gao, Xiaodong Li et al.
Vaccine
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Personal vs professional HPV vaccination and screening among female healthcare workers in China

Chenyang Pei, Hua Yang, Xiang Gao, Xiaodong Li, Qunfeng Dong, Lan Zhu, Runqi Zhang, Kun Shi
article en

Abstract

Background Female healthcare workers (FHCWs) play a key role in promoting HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening, yet their own preventive behaviors may not align with their professional recommendations. This study aimed to assess the dissociation between personal uptake and professional promotion of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening among FHCWs in China. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 7149 FHCWs in gynecology and obstetrics across 31 provinces in China in 2024. A unified Bayesian network simultaneously modeled four outcomes: own HPV vaccination, own cervical cancer screening within 3 years, and recommendation of vaccination and screening to patients. Bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates) and conditional independence tests assessed the stability and significance of each predictor. Results Among 7149 FHCWs, 45.3% were vaccinated, 80.8% had been screened within 3 years, 75.2% recommended vaccination to patients, and 83.1% recommended screening to patients. For personal behavior, age was the sole direct parent (100% bootstrap; p < 10 −148 ). For recommendation behavior, profession was directly associated with vaccination recommendation (100% bootstrap; p < 10 −84 ) and screening recommendation (86.0% bootstrap; p < 10 −71 ); physicians recommended vaccination to 87.2% of patients versus 67.6% for nurses ( p < 10 −78 ), despite similar personal vaccination rates (43.8% vs 46.2%; p = 0.052). HPV knowledge was associated with vaccination recommendation (86.9% bootstrap; p < 10 −16 ) but not personal vaccination (36.1% bootstrap). Cervical cancer risk factor knowledge was associated with screening recommendation (83.4% bootstrap; p < 10 −34 ). Conclusion Knowledge and profession were associated with what FHCWs recommend to patients but were not associated with their own vaccination or screening. Increasing FHCW vaccination requires structural interventions. Increasing patient uptake requires improving knowledge and recommendation practices among FHCWs, particularly nurses.

VaccineVol. 88
Hebei Medical University (CN), Loyola University Chicago (US), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Heidelberg University (DE), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.