Latent infrastructure sensing: Repurposing existing sensing mechanisms for infrastructure Health monitoring

Aging civil infrastructure presents growing risks to public safety and structural resilience. Although structural health monitoring (SHM) has proven highly effective in monitoring and assessing critical assets, its broader implementation is hindered by upfront costs and the practical difficulties of deploying dedicated monitoring systems. Meanwhile, today’s cities generate massive, continuous data streams from connected vehicles, mobile devices, satellites, surveillance cameras, fiber-optic cables, and many other systems, originally designed for purposes like transportation, utilities, and security. A growing body of research shows that such urban data sources can be repurposed to infer structural health conditions across infrastructure networks more practically, while also supporting the objectives of the Smart & Connected Communities and Infrastructure Systems and People paradigms. Despite increasing interest, this field has lacked a unifying identity and systematic structure. Thus, this article attempts to formalize this domain of repurposing existing sensing mechanisms for infrastructure health monitoring under the term Latent Infrastructure Sensing (LIS). “Latent” emphasizes that valuable structural health information is already embedded in everyday urban data flow but remains largely concealed/underutilized/unexplored. In this article, we define the conceptual boundaries of LIS, propose a general evaluation criterion grounded in Reliability, Effectiveness, Actionability, and Practicality, and introduce the LIS Intelligence Framework that traces raw latent data through processing stages to decision-ready insights. We further synthesize existing LIS research into distinct categories (with representative studies), including crowdsensing via vehicles and mobile devices, satellite interferometry, stationary camera analytics, and emerging infrastructure sensing using fiber-optic cables, while highlighting key methodological gaps as well as socio-technical and governance challenges. We also identify promising future opportunities, such as sensing enabled by delivery robots, electric vehicle charging roads, and smart home devices. Hence, this article lays the foundation for scalable, practical, and potentially cost-effective infrastructure health monitoring that leverages data already coursing through contemporary cities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Health Monitoring
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217261455584
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Latent infrastructure sensing: Repurposing existing sensing mechanisms for infrastructure Health monitoring

Liangfu Ge, Abdollah Malekjafarian, Furkan Luleci, Jingxiao Liu et al.
Structural Health Monitoring
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Latent infrastructure sensing: Repurposing existing sensing mechanisms for infrastructure Health monitoring

Liangfu Ge, Abdollah Malekjafarian, Furkan Luleci, Jingxiao Liu, F. Necati Çatbaş, Mohammad R. Jahanshahi, Hae Young Noh, Maria Pina Limongelli, Zhenkun Li
article en

Abstract

Aging civil infrastructure presents growing risks to public safety and structural resilience. Although structural health monitoring (SHM) has proven highly effective in monitoring and assessing critical assets, its broader implementation is hindered by upfront costs and the practical difficulties of deploying dedicated monitoring systems. Meanwhile, today’s cities generate massive, continuous data streams from connected vehicles, mobile devices, satellites, surveillance cameras, fiber-optic cables, and many other systems, originally designed for purposes like transportation, utilities, and security. A growing body of research shows that such urban data sources can be repurposed to infer structural health conditions across infrastructure networks more practically, while also supporting the objectives of the Smart & Connected Communities and Infrastructure Systems and People paradigms. Despite increasing interest, this field has lacked a unifying identity and systematic structure. Thus, this article attempts to formalize this domain of repurposing existing sensing mechanisms for infrastructure health monitoring under the term Latent Infrastructure Sensing (LIS). “Latent” emphasizes that valuable structural health information is already embedded in everyday urban data flow but remains largely concealed/underutilized/unexplored. In this article, we define the conceptual boundaries of LIS, propose a general evaluation criterion grounded in Reliability, Effectiveness, Actionability, and Practicality, and introduce the LIS Intelligence Framework that traces raw latent data through processing stages to decision-ready insights. We further synthesize existing LIS research into distinct categories (with representative studies), including crowdsensing via vehicles and mobile devices, satellite interferometry, stationary camera analytics, and emerging infrastructure sensing using fiber-optic cables, while highlighting key methodological gaps as well as socio-technical and governance challenges. We also identify promising future opportunities, such as sensing enabled by delivery robots, electric vehicle charging roads, and smart home devices. Hence, this article lays the foundation for scalable, practical, and potentially cost-effective infrastructure health monitoring that leverages data already coursing through contemporary cities.

Structural Health Monitoring
University College Dublin (IE), University of Central Florida (US), Louisiana State University (US), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT), Stanford University (US), Aalto University (FI)
University of Central Florida
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.