Evaluating the use of drones within medical logistics: A patient-focused qualitative evaluation

Drone technologies offer significant promise for enhancing medical logistics, particularly in rural and remote areas. However, despite several pilot trials across the UK, there remains a lack of evidence regarding patient perceptions of drone integration in routine healthcare delivery. This study aimed to explore patient perspectives on the use of drones in medical logistics, with a focus on cost, safety, and impact on quality of life amongst three medical areas (chemotherapy, lab diagnostics and blood products). A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and small focus groups was conducted with 26 participants from five Scottish health boards. Participants were recruited via NHS engagement leads, community networks, and snowball sampling. Data were collected via Microsoft Teams and analysed thematically using an inductive approach. Eight key themes emerged: Acceptance, Knowledge of drones, Potential use within the NHS, Potential impact, Concerns, Public perception, Support networks, and Future innovation. Participants expressed cautious optimism, highlighting potential benefits including improved access in rural areas, reduced travel burdens, and environmental gains. Concerns included technical reliability, regulatory complexity, data privacy, and the risk of increasing health inequities. Drones were viewed by patients as a promising complement to existing medical logistics, especially for emergency and rural applications. However, successful integration demands transparent communication, co-design with stakeholders, robust regulatory planning, and sustainable funding models to ensure equitable and safe implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001459
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the use of drones within medical logistics: A patient-focused qualitative evaluation

Colin B. Shore, A. Shepherd, Dylan Powell, Karen Bell et al.
PLOS Digital Health
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

Evaluating the use of drones within medical logistics: A patient-focused qualitative evaluation

Colin B. Shore, A. Shepherd, Dylan Powell, Karen Bell, Frances Hines, Hazel Dempsey
article en

Abstract

Drone technologies offer significant promise for enhancing medical logistics, particularly in rural and remote areas. However, despite several pilot trials across the UK, there remains a lack of evidence regarding patient perceptions of drone integration in routine healthcare delivery. This study aimed to explore patient perspectives on the use of drones in medical logistics, with a focus on cost, safety, and impact on quality of life amongst three medical areas (chemotherapy, lab diagnostics and blood products). A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and small focus groups was conducted with 26 participants from five Scottish health boards. Participants were recruited via NHS engagement leads, community networks, and snowball sampling. Data were collected via Microsoft Teams and analysed thematically using an inductive approach. Eight key themes emerged: Acceptance, Knowledge of drones, Potential use within the NHS, Potential impact, Concerns, Public perception, Support networks, and Future innovation. Participants expressed cautious optimism, highlighting potential benefits including improved access in rural areas, reduced travel burdens, and environmental gains. Concerns included technical reliability, regulatory complexity, data privacy, and the risk of increasing health inequities. Drones were viewed by patients as a promising complement to existing medical logistics, especially for emergency and rural applications. However, successful integration demands transparent communication, co-design with stakeholders, robust regulatory planning, and sustainable funding models to ensure equitable and safe implementation.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(6)
University of Stirling (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), NHS Grampian (GB), NHS Highland (GB)
Innovate UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.