Endothelial progenitor cell susceptibility to DNA damaging and DDR-modulating compounds determines endothelial differentiation accuracy

The clinical use of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (Dox) is limited by irreversible cardiotoxicity. The pathophysiological relevance of different cardiac cell types, including endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), in this process is unclear. Since progenitor cells are particularly relevant for tissue regeneration, we hypothesize that residual damage resulting from Dox-based therapeutic regimen may influence their endothelial differentiation accuracy. Therefore, we comparatively investigated the response of murine embryonic stem cells (mESC), endothelial progenitor cells (EC d4) and terminally differentiated endothelial-like cells (EC d6) following exposure to Dox and selected pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair/DNA damage response (DDR) (RAD51i B02; HDACi entinostat (EST)). We show that EC d4 exhibit enhanced Dox sensitivity as compared to mESC and EC d6. EdU incorporation and replication fork progression analyses revealed pronounced agent-specific differences between mESC, EC d4 and EC d6. Furthermore, DNA damage formation varied in a drug-dependent manner, with mESC showing enhanced residual levels of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) as compared to EC d4 and EC d6 while EC d6 revealed highest levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Dox treatment of EC d4 did not prevent their further differentiation into EC d6. However, it caused several functional impairments in the surviving EC d6 progeny, including defects in mitochondrial homeostasis, endothelial barrier function related to cell-cell adhesion factors (ZO1, VE-cadherin), cytokine response and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake. This is accompanied by increased senescence. Summarizing, we demonstrate both overlapping and agent-specific responses of mESC, EC d4 and EC d6 to Dox and DNA repair/DDR inhibitors. Notably, drug treatment of EPC (EC d4) causes multiple dysfunctions in differentiated EC d6. Hence, pharmacological measures aiming to specifically protect EPC from Dox-induced damage are suggested to foster the maintenance of healthy endothelial functionality during regeneration, thereby lowering the risk of detrimental late cardiotoxicity resulting from Dox-based anticancer regimen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-026-05087-1
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endothelial progenitor cell susceptibility to DNA damaging and DDR-modulating compounds determines endothelial differentiation accuracy

Andreas S. Reichert, Gerhard Fritz, Michelle Westerhoff, Sina Federmann
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
article

Endothelial progenitor cell susceptibility to DNA damaging and DDR-modulating compounds determines endothelial differentiation accuracy

Andreas S. Reichert, Gerhard Fritz, Michelle Westerhoff, Sina Federmann
article en

Abstract

The clinical use of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (Dox) is limited by irreversible cardiotoxicity. The pathophysiological relevance of different cardiac cell types, including endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), in this process is unclear. Since progenitor cells are particularly relevant for tissue regeneration, we hypothesize that residual damage resulting from Dox-based therapeutic regimen may influence their endothelial differentiation accuracy. Therefore, we comparatively investigated the response of murine embryonic stem cells (mESC), endothelial progenitor cells (EC d4) and terminally differentiated endothelial-like cells (EC d6) following exposure to Dox and selected pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair/DNA damage response (DDR) (RAD51i B02; HDACi entinostat (EST)). We show that EC d4 exhibit enhanced Dox sensitivity as compared to mESC and EC d6. EdU incorporation and replication fork progression analyses revealed pronounced agent-specific differences between mESC, EC d4 and EC d6. Furthermore, DNA damage formation varied in a drug-dependent manner, with mESC showing enhanced residual levels of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) as compared to EC d4 and EC d6 while EC d6 revealed highest levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Dox treatment of EC d4 did not prevent their further differentiation into EC d6. However, it caused several functional impairments in the surviving EC d6 progeny, including defects in mitochondrial homeostasis, endothelial barrier function related to cell-cell adhesion factors (ZO1, VE-cadherin), cytokine response and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake. This is accompanied by increased senescence. Summarizing, we demonstrate both overlapping and agent-specific responses of mESC, EC d4 and EC d6 to Dox and DNA repair/DDR inhibitors. Notably, drug treatment of EPC (EC d4) causes multiple dysfunctions in differentiated EC d6. Hence, pharmacological measures aiming to specifically protect EPC from Dox-induced damage are suggested to foster the maintenance of healthy endothelial functionality during regeneration, thereby lowering the risk of detrimental late cardiotoxicity resulting from Dox-based anticancer regimen.

Stem Cell Research & TherapyVol. 17(1)
Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.