Take-Off Velocity and Trunk Inclination Enhance Countermovement Jump Assessment in Older Women

ABSTRACT: Papale, O, Di Rocco, F, Festino, E, Capranica, L, Picerno, P, Cortis, C, and Fusco, A. Take-off velocity and trunk inclination enhance countermovement jump assessment in older women. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The aims of the study were (1) to analyze different countermovement jump height (CMJ) performance equations to compare the agreement and reliability of these methods and (2) to investigate the influence of forward trunk inclination (Bend@Jump) on take-off velocity (TOV) during CMJ in older women. Twenty subjects (age: 70.6 ± 6.2 years; body mass: 59.1 ± 10.7 kg; height: 159 ± 6.1 cm) were assessed. During the jump trials, TOV, Bend@Jump, and flight time were measured using a wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a photoelectric Optojump (Opto) system to derive 3 CMJ outcomes: jump height estimated from TOV (TOV-CMJ), IMU (IMU-CMJ), Opto (Opto-CMJ). Linear mixed models, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman Plots, and Standard Error of Measurements (SEM) were used to assess agreement and reliability. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of Bend@Jump on TOV. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. For each CMJ methodology, means and SDs were calculated (TOV = 1.1 ± 0.2 m·s-1; Bend@Jump = 10.1 ± 7.9°; TOV-CMJ = 8.4 ± 2.9 cm; IMU-CMJ = 10.6 ± 3.6 cm; Opto-CMJ = 7.1 ± 3.8 cm). High intraclass correlation coefficient values emerged (TOV-CMJ = 0.84; IMU-CMJ = 0.88; Opto-CMJ = 0.91). SEM resulted higher in IMU-CMJ (1.24 cm) than TOV-CMJ (1.18 cm) and Opto-CMJ (1.15 cm). A significant (p < 0.0001) relationship (R2 = 0.96) between Bend@Jump and TOV emerged. Jump height estimations based on flight time tend to overestimate performance compared with TOV. Given the high reliability observed across the measurement methods and the strong relationship between Bend@Jump and TOV, IMU-based assessment integrating TOV and Bend@Jump may represent a practical approach for evaluating CMJ in older women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005569
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Take-Off Velocity and Trunk Inclination Enhance Countermovement Jump Assessment in Older Women

Olga Papale, Emanuel Festino, Francesca Di Rocco, Andrea Fusco et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Take-Off Velocity and Trunk Inclination Enhance Countermovement Jump Assessment in Older Women

Olga Papale, Emanuel Festino, Francesca Di Rocco, Andrea Fusco, Laura Capranica, Cristina Cortis, Pietro Picerno
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Papale, O, Di Rocco, F, Festino, E, Capranica, L, Picerno, P, Cortis, C, and Fusco, A. Take-off velocity and trunk inclination enhance countermovement jump assessment in older women. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The aims of the study were (1) to analyze different countermovement jump height (CMJ) performance equations to compare the agreement and reliability of these methods and (2) to investigate the influence of forward trunk inclination (Bend@Jump) on take-off velocity (TOV) during CMJ in older women. Twenty subjects (age: 70.6 ± 6.2 years; body mass: 59.1 ± 10.7 kg; height: 159 ± 6.1 cm) were assessed. During the jump trials, TOV, Bend@Jump, and flight time were measured using a wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a photoelectric Optojump (Opto) system to derive 3 CMJ outcomes: jump height estimated from TOV (TOV-CMJ), IMU (IMU-CMJ), Opto (Opto-CMJ). Linear mixed models, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman Plots, and Standard Error of Measurements (SEM) were used to assess agreement and reliability. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of Bend@Jump on TOV. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. For each CMJ methodology, means and SDs were calculated (TOV = 1.1 ± 0.2 m·s-1; Bend@Jump = 10.1 ± 7.9°; TOV-CMJ = 8.4 ± 2.9 cm; IMU-CMJ = 10.6 ± 3.6 cm; Opto-CMJ = 7.1 ± 3.8 cm). High intraclass correlation coefficient values emerged (TOV-CMJ = 0.84; IMU-CMJ = 0.88; Opto-CMJ = 0.91). SEM resulted higher in IMU-CMJ (1.24 cm) than TOV-CMJ (1.18 cm) and Opto-CMJ (1.15 cm). A significant (p < 0.0001) relationship (R2 = 0.96) between Bend@Jump and TOV emerged. Jump height estimations based on flight time tend to overestimate performance compared with TOV. Given the high reliability observed across the measurement methods and the strong relationship between Bend@Jump and TOV, IMU-based assessment integrating TOV and Bend@Jump may represent a practical approach for evaluating CMJ in older women.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Università di Camerino (IT), Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), Foro Italico University of Rome (IT), San Raffaele University of Rome (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.