Comparison of Negative Automatic Thoughts and Self-Efficacy Levels in Mental Disorders

Purpose: To compare the levels of negative automatic thoughts (NATs) and self-efficacy among individuals with different mental disorders and examine the relationship between NATs and self-efficacy levels across the sample. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 187 individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, anxiety, and substance use disorder (SUD) who attended a psychiatry outpatient clinic. Data were collected using the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (NATQ) and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Results: Mean GSE total score of individuals with SUD and schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was lower and mean NATQ total score was higher than other groups ( p < .001). A significant negative correlation was found between mean GSE total score and mean NATQ total score ( r = −0.983; p < .001). Mean NATQ total score explained 96.7% of the score obtained from the GSE (R 2 = 0.967; p < .001). Conclusion: Individuals with mental disorders had high levels of NATs and low levels of self-efficacy. Given the higher levels of NATs and lower self-efficacy observed among individuals with SUD and schizophrenia, these groups may benefit from additional support and interventions targeting cognitive distortions and self-efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20260619-01
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Negative Automatic Thoughts and Self-Efficacy Levels in Mental Disorders

Özlem Şahi̇n Altun, Eylül BAŞER, D ÖZER
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Comparison of Negative Automatic Thoughts and Self-Efficacy Levels in Mental Disorders

Özlem Şahi̇n Altun, Eylül BAŞER, D ÖZER
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the levels of negative automatic thoughts (NATs) and self-efficacy among individuals with different mental disorders and examine the relationship between NATs and self-efficacy levels across the sample. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 187 individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, anxiety, and substance use disorder (SUD) who attended a psychiatry outpatient clinic. Data were collected using the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (NATQ) and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Results: Mean GSE total score of individuals with SUD and schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was lower and mean NATQ total score was higher than other groups ( p < .001). A significant negative correlation was found between mean GSE total score and mean NATQ total score ( r = −0.983; p < .001). Mean NATQ total score explained 96.7% of the score obtained from the GSE (R 2 = 0.967; p < .001). Conclusion: Individuals with mental disorders had high levels of NATs and low levels of self-efficacy. Given the higher levels of NATs and lower self-efficacy observed among individuals with SUD and schizophrenia, these groups may benefit from additional support and interventions targeting cognitive distortions and self-efficacy.

Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
University Psychiatric Hospital (SI), Psychiatric Medical Center (AM), Atatürk University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.