Evaluation of a Locally Registered UAV Photogrammetry and Smartphone LiDAR Workflow for Scan-to-BIM Documentation of an Existing Building

The digital documentation of existing buildings is particularly important when original construction drawings or reliable as-built records are unavailable. This study evaluates the feasibility and selected dimensional consistency of a locally registered Scan-to-BIM workflow integrating unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry for exterior documentation and smartphone LiDAR for interior data capture. A two-storey reinforced-concrete building with unavailable original project documentation was selected as a single case study. Exterior images were acquired using a DJI Mavic 3E (DJI, Shenzhen, China), while interior spaces were scanned using an iPhone 16 Pro Max (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) and Polycam v5.1.5 in LiDAR mode. The UAV images were processed in Agisoft Metashape Professional 2.2.0 to generate the exterior photogrammetric point cloud, and the smartphone LiDAR data were organised with this dataset in Autodesk ReCap Pro 2025. Both point clouds were then used as geometric references for creating a geometry-oriented as-is BIM model in Autodesk Revit 2025. To evaluate selected dimensional consistency, 32 independent field measurements collected using a steel tape measure and a laser distance meter were compared with corresponding BIM-derived dimensions. The dimensional comparison yielded a mean absolute error (MAE) of 29.56 mm, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 31.21 mm, a maximum absolute error (MaxAE) of 46.00 mm, and a mean signed error (MSE) of +29.56 mm. These results indicate centimetre-level dimensional consistency for the selected validation dimensions, with a small systematic positive offset in the BIM-derived dimensions. The workflow can support preliminary geometric documentation and general as-is BIM for a small existing building, but it does not demonstrate survey-grade georeferencing, full registration accuracy, modelling reproducibility, or general applicability without further testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16132512
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Locally Registered UAV Photogrammetry and Smartphone LiDAR Workflow for Scan-to-BIM Documentation of an Existing Building

Merve Uluçay Temel, Bayram Ali Temel
Buildings
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Evaluation of a Locally Registered UAV Photogrammetry and Smartphone LiDAR Workflow for Scan-to-BIM Documentation of an Existing Building

Merve Uluçay Temel, Bayram Ali Temel
article en

Abstract

The digital documentation of existing buildings is particularly important when original construction drawings or reliable as-built records are unavailable. This study evaluates the feasibility and selected dimensional consistency of a locally registered Scan-to-BIM workflow integrating unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry for exterior documentation and smartphone LiDAR for interior data capture. A two-storey reinforced-concrete building with unavailable original project documentation was selected as a single case study. Exterior images were acquired using a DJI Mavic 3E (DJI, Shenzhen, China), while interior spaces were scanned using an iPhone 16 Pro Max (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) and Polycam v5.1.5 in LiDAR mode. The UAV images were processed in Agisoft Metashape Professional 2.2.0 to generate the exterior photogrammetric point cloud, and the smartphone LiDAR data were organised with this dataset in Autodesk ReCap Pro 2025. Both point clouds were then used as geometric references for creating a geometry-oriented as-is BIM model in Autodesk Revit 2025. To evaluate selected dimensional consistency, 32 independent field measurements collected using a steel tape measure and a laser distance meter were compared with corresponding BIM-derived dimensions. The dimensional comparison yielded a mean absolute error (MAE) of 29.56 mm, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 31.21 mm, a maximum absolute error (MaxAE) of 46.00 mm, and a mean signed error (MSE) of +29.56 mm. These results indicate centimetre-level dimensional consistency for the selected validation dimensions, with a small systematic positive offset in the BIM-derived dimensions. The workflow can support preliminary geometric documentation and general as-is BIM for a small existing building, but it does not demonstrate survey-grade georeferencing, full registration accuracy, modelling reproducibility, or general applicability without further testing.

BuildingsVol. 16(13)
Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.