Межвселенодром: архитектура, размещение, безопасность

The article "Interuniversal Spaceport: Architecture, Placement, Safety" examines three options for locating a facility for launching and receiving interuniversal expeditions: on Earth, on the far side of the Moon, and in space (Lagrange points L4/L5 or heliocentric orbit). For each option, estimates are provided for construction costs, labor requirements, transportation expenses, and operational costs, including transport hubs (airfield, cosmodrome, docking port) and evacuation means (ground transport, arriving ships, emergency shuttle). The Earth-based option is the cheapest (~$17 billion) and most accessible, but risky due to proximity to populated areas. It is recommended only for 1st generation probes with an instant destruction system. The lunar option (~$130 billion) is optimal for manned missions but requires a critical note: the Moon cannot be lost even in an emergency, as it affects Earth's stability. The space option at L4/L5 (~$255 billion) is suitable for medium-risk missions, while the heliocentric orbit (>10 million km, ~$508 billion) is intended for high-risk missions (pre-atomic universes, contact, reverse infiltration). The main conclusion: the higher the mission risk, the farther from Earth the interuniversal spaceport should be located, but each step into space increases the cost and complexity of the project by orders of magnitude. The article contains numerical engineering estimates and accounts for reverse infiltration risks, distinguishing it from existing conceptual works.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20881106
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Межвселенодром: архитектура, размещение, безопасность

Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
preprint

Межвселенодром: архитектура, размещение, безопасность

Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov
preprint en

Abstract

The article "Interuniversal Spaceport: Architecture, Placement, Safety" examines three options for locating a facility for launching and receiving interuniversal expeditions: on Earth, on the far side of the Moon, and in space (Lagrange points L4/L5 or heliocentric orbit). For each option, estimates are provided for construction costs, labor requirements, transportation expenses, and operational costs, including transport hubs (airfield, cosmodrome, docking port) and evacuation means (ground transport, arriving ships, emergency shuttle). The Earth-based option is the cheapest (~$17 billion) and most accessible, but risky due to proximity to populated areas. It is recommended only for 1st generation probes with an instant destruction system. The lunar option (~$130 billion) is optimal for manned missions but requires a critical note: the Moon cannot be lost even in an emergency, as it affects Earth's stability. The space option at L4/L5 (~$255 billion) is suitable for medium-risk missions, while the heliocentric orbit (>10 million km, ~$508 billion) is intended for high-risk missions (pre-atomic universes, contact, reverse infiltration). The main conclusion: the higher the mission risk, the farther from Earth the interuniversal spaceport should be located, but each step into space increases the cost and complexity of the project by orders of magnitude. The article contains numerical engineering estimates and accounts for reverse infiltration risks, distinguishing it from existing conceptual works.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Межвселенодром: архитектура, размещение, безопасность — Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS