Did the outbreak of COVID‐19 and individual exposure to it increase ingroup bias in the USA? An experimental investigation of interethnic trust

Abstract Pathogen‐stress and terror‐management theories predict that lethal epidemics heighten parochial cooperation. We test this prediction experimentally in two nationally representative US samples surveyed before and at the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We compare trust and expected trustworthiness across the two waves in monetarily incentivized trust games involving non‐Hispanic Whites, African Americans and Hispanics. We find significant ingroup favouritism in both waves. However, the aggregate ingroup premium fell by about one‐half between waves. This decline was concentrated among left‐leaning and moderate respondents. While non‐Hispanic Whites tended to reduce their ingroup bias in expected trustworthiness, the opposite was found for African Americans. Respondents more exposed to COVID‐19 displayed higher intergroup trust, altruism and expected trustworthiness than others. These results contradict the hypothesis that lethal epidemics intensify parochialism, also suggesting that the response may be diversified across groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70062
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Did the outbreak of COVID‐19 and individual exposure to it increase ingroup bias in the USA? An experimental investigation of interethnic trust

David Pipke, Fabrice Murtin, Louis Putterman, Gianluca Grimalda et al.
Economica
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Did the outbreak of COVID‐19 and individual exposure to it increase ingroup bias in the USA? An experimental investigation of interethnic trust

David Pipke, Fabrice Murtin, Louis Putterman, Gianluca Grimalda, Matthias Sutter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pathogen‐stress and terror‐management theories predict that lethal epidemics heighten parochial cooperation. We test this prediction experimentally in two nationally representative US samples surveyed before and at the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We compare trust and expected trustworthiness across the two waves in monetarily incentivized trust games involving non‐Hispanic Whites, African Americans and Hispanics. We find significant ingroup favouritism in both waves. However, the aggregate ingroup premium fell by about one‐half between waves. This decline was concentrated among left‐leaning and moderate respondents. While non‐Hispanic Whites tended to reduce their ingroup bias in expected trustworthiness, the opposite was found for African Americans. Respondents more exposed to COVID‐19 displayed higher intergroup trust, altruism and expected trustworthiness than others. These results contradict the hypothesis that lethal epidemics intensify parochialism, also suggesting that the response may be diversified across groups.

Economica
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), John Brown University (US), University of Passau (DE), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.