Anaerobic Digestate and Carbon Dot Biostimulants: Nutrient Uptake Efficiency and Residual Effects on Corn (Zea mays L.) Vegetative Growth in Sandy Soils

Sustainable crop production in nutrient-poor sandy soils requires fertilization strategies that improve nutrient uptake while reducing environmental impact. This study evaluated anaerobic cattle manure digestate and carbon dot biostimulants as alternatives to conventional mineral NPK (nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium) fertilizer for corn (Zea mays L., cv. AG 1051) during vegetative development. A randomized greenhouse experiment compared nine treatments over three successive 45-day cycles, assessing shoot-tissue macronutrient content (N, P, K) and morphological parameters (shoot dry weight, stem diameter, and plant height). Digestate delivered approximately 1.4× more phosphorus and 8.4× more potassium per pot than mineral NPK, although nitrogen inputs were matched (~77 mg pot−1). Digestate-based treatments achieved shoot dry weight 132% above control and 63% above mineral fertilizer (p < 0.001), with biomass advantages sustained across all three cycles while mineral fertilizer effects dissipated entirely by Cycle 3. Phosphorus content was the strongest biomass predictor (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and a significant nitrogen–phosphorus antagonism (r = −0.59, p < 0.001) revealed relevant nutrient interaction dynamics. The higher biomass observed under digestate-based treatments reflects both the higher total P and K inputs from digestate and the beneficial effects of organic matter on nutrient bioavailability in this phosphorus-limited system. Carbon dot biostimulants did not improve biomass when applied alone (values at or below control), but they contributed to intermediate biomass gains when combined with nutrient sources, functioning as nutrient uptake enhancers rather than standalone fertilizers. Principal component analysis (74.3% variance explained) classified the nine treatments into three distinct treatment clusters. These findings support digestate valorization as a circular-economy alternative to conventional mineral fertilization, offering higher biomass under N-equivalent application and sustained residual effects in nutrient-poor sandy soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8070262
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaerobic Digestate and Carbon Dot Biostimulants: Nutrient Uptake Efficiency and Residual Effects on Corn (Zea mays L.) Vegetative Growth in Sandy Soils

Rômulo Simões Cézar Menezes, Paula Renata Muniz Araújo, Allan Almeida Albuquerque, Jéssica Rafaella de Sousa Oliveira et al.
AgriEngineering
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Anaerobic Digestate and Carbon Dot Biostimulants: Nutrient Uptake Efficiency and Residual Effects on Corn (Zea mays L.) Vegetative Growth in Sandy Soils

Rômulo Simões Cézar Menezes, Paula Renata Muniz Araújo, Allan Almeida Albuquerque, Jéssica Rafaella de Sousa Oliveira, Ana Dolores Santiago de Freitas, Juscélia da Silva Ferreira, Kaline A. Wanderley, Daniela Silva Gomes Moreira do Valle, Marcélio Alves Teotônio, Jadde Milena Guedes Secundino
article en

Abstract

Sustainable crop production in nutrient-poor sandy soils requires fertilization strategies that improve nutrient uptake while reducing environmental impact. This study evaluated anaerobic cattle manure digestate and carbon dot biostimulants as alternatives to conventional mineral NPK (nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium) fertilizer for corn (Zea mays L., cv. AG 1051) during vegetative development. A randomized greenhouse experiment compared nine treatments over three successive 45-day cycles, assessing shoot-tissue macronutrient content (N, P, K) and morphological parameters (shoot dry weight, stem diameter, and plant height). Digestate delivered approximately 1.4× more phosphorus and 8.4× more potassium per pot than mineral NPK, although nitrogen inputs were matched (~77 mg pot−1). Digestate-based treatments achieved shoot dry weight 132% above control and 63% above mineral fertilizer (p < 0.001), with biomass advantages sustained across all three cycles while mineral fertilizer effects dissipated entirely by Cycle 3. Phosphorus content was the strongest biomass predictor (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and a significant nitrogen–phosphorus antagonism (r = −0.59, p < 0.001) revealed relevant nutrient interaction dynamics. The higher biomass observed under digestate-based treatments reflects both the higher total P and K inputs from digestate and the beneficial effects of organic matter on nutrient bioavailability in this phosphorus-limited system. Carbon dot biostimulants did not improve biomass when applied alone (values at or below control), but they contributed to intermediate biomass gains when combined with nutrient sources, functioning as nutrient uptake enhancers rather than standalone fertilizers. Principal component analysis (74.3% variance explained) classified the nine treatments into three distinct treatment clusters. These findings support digestate valorization as a circular-economy alternative to conventional mineral fertilization, offering higher biomass under N-equivalent application and sustained residual effects in nutrient-poor sandy soils.

AgriEngineeringVol. 8(7)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Institute of Physics (AZ)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco, Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.