RSV Immunoprophylaxis in Infants and Children: Old Standards, New Agents and the Complexities Therein

Every year, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes an estimated 33 million lower respiratory tract infections in children under five years of age, driving millions of hospitalizations worldwide and substantial mortality in developing countries. For 28 years, the monoclonal antibody (mAb) palivizumab has been the principal agent for RSV immunoprophylaxis, reducing hospitalization in defined high-risk groups through monthly intramuscular dosing. The recent approval of two second-generation long-acting mAbs, nirsevimab and clesrovimab, and maternal preF vaccine has fundamentally changed the RSV prevention landscape. In contrast to palivizumab, the long-acting mAbs offer single-dose seasonal protection across a broader infant population, enabling universal immunization programmes for the first time. In this review, we conjointly examine nirsevimab and clesrovimab across their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness, using palivizumab as the reference standard. Cross-trial efficacy comparisons are complicated by differences in study populations and endpoint definitions; however, when these factors are considered, the available evidence suggests that all three agents offer broadly comparable protection against severe RSV disease. All three agents also demonstrate favourable and comparable tolerability profiles. Nirsevimab is now supported by a substantial body of real-world evidence confirming effectiveness in routine immunization programmes that closely align with registrational studies. Clesrovimab, as the newest agent, currently lacks real-world effectiveness, and both long-acting monoclonals require further confirmatory evidence in high-risk groups. Overall, existing data support that both monoclonals have equivalent efficacy and safety profiles as palivizumab, and choice should be based on cost-effectiveness and local availability, with consideration given to optimal integration of infant immunoprophylaxis alongside maternal RSV vaccination programmes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14070556
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RSV Immunoprophylaxis in Infants and Children: Old Standards, New Agents and the Complexities Therein

Bosco A Paes, Paolo Manzoni, John Fullarton, Barry Rodgers‐Gray et al.
Vaccines
Respiratory viral infections research
article

RSV Immunoprophylaxis in Infants and Children: Old Standards, New Agents and the Complexities Therein

Bosco A Paes, Paolo Manzoni, John Fullarton, Barry Rodgers‐Gray, Xavier Carbonell-Estrany
article en

Abstract

Every year, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes an estimated 33 million lower respiratory tract infections in children under five years of age, driving millions of hospitalizations worldwide and substantial mortality in developing countries. For 28 years, the monoclonal antibody (mAb) palivizumab has been the principal agent for RSV immunoprophylaxis, reducing hospitalization in defined high-risk groups through monthly intramuscular dosing. The recent approval of two second-generation long-acting mAbs, nirsevimab and clesrovimab, and maternal preF vaccine has fundamentally changed the RSV prevention landscape. In contrast to palivizumab, the long-acting mAbs offer single-dose seasonal protection across a broader infant population, enabling universal immunization programmes for the first time. In this review, we conjointly examine nirsevimab and clesrovimab across their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness, using palivizumab as the reference standard. Cross-trial efficacy comparisons are complicated by differences in study populations and endpoint definitions; however, when these factors are considered, the available evidence suggests that all three agents offer broadly comparable protection against severe RSV disease. All three agents also demonstrate favourable and comparable tolerability profiles. Nirsevimab is now supported by a substantial body of real-world evidence confirming effectiveness in routine immunization programmes that closely align with registrational studies. Clesrovimab, as the newest agent, currently lacks real-world effectiveness, and both long-acting monoclonals require further confirmatory evidence in high-risk groups. Overall, existing data support that both monoclonals have equivalent efficacy and safety profiles as palivizumab, and choice should be based on cost-effectiveness and local availability, with consideration given to optimal integration of infant immunoprophylaxis alongside maternal RSV vaccination programmes.

VaccinesVol. 14(7)
AWE Nuclear Security Technologies (GB), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Ospedale degli Infermi (IT), Department of Public Health (US), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.