The Autonomous Enterprise Has a Basis Problem: Why operational autonomy must catch up to process autonomy

At SAP Sapphire 2026, SAP set out an ambitious vision in which AI agents run core business processes while people focus on higher-value work. That vision was told almost entirely from the application tier down: finance closes itself, procurement negotiates, supply chains reroute autonomously. This paper argues that the narrative leaves a critical question unanswered, when agents run the business, who runs the agents? It names the resulting risk the Operational Autonomy Gap, the widening distance between how autonomous business processes have become and how autonomous the operations beneath them remain, and proposes a five-level model of autonomous SAP operations to diagnose it. It then sets out four pillars for closing the gap, observability, self-healing, continuously validated resilience, and de-identified non-production data, and describes the governance role Basis and operations teams must claim as the discipline shifts from firefighting to orchestration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20858380
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Autonomous Enterprise Has a Basis Problem: Why operational autonomy must catch up to process autonomy

Puneet Khatri
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
preprint

The Autonomous Enterprise Has a Basis Problem: Why operational autonomy must catch up to process autonomy

Puneet Khatri
preprint en

Abstract

At SAP Sapphire 2026, SAP set out an ambitious vision in which AI agents run core business processes while people focus on higher-value work. That vision was told almost entirely from the application tier down: finance closes itself, procurement negotiates, supply chains reroute autonomously. This paper argues that the narrative leaves a critical question unanswered, when agents run the business, who runs the agents? It names the resulting risk the Operational Autonomy Gap, the widening distance between how autonomous business processes have become and how autonomous the operations beneath them remain, and proposes a five-level model of autonomous SAP operations to diagnose it. It then sets out four pillars for closing the gap, observability, self-healing, continuously validated resilience, and de-identified non-production data, and describes the governance role Basis and operations teams must claim as the discipline shifts from firefighting to orchestration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.