Incolla questo: Systemic Arrestability: Operator Protection in Machine Safety Law When Machine Speed Exceeds Human Reaction

Machine safety law rests on a foundational principle: the protection of the operator. Across legal systems, safety regulations require that machines be designed and operated so that dangerous situations can be stopped before injury occurs. This paper argues that such protection rests on an implicit temporal assumption: that the operator retains a meaningful opportunity to perceive a developing hazard, evaluate it, and intervene before harm occurs. To address this gap, the paper introduces the concept of systemic arrestability: a system is systemically arrestable when its capacity to halt a hazardous action does not depend on a human operator perceiving, evaluating, and intervening within the time window of that action. Through a comparative analysis of the European, Swiss, and United States machine-safety frameworks, the paper proposes systemic arrestability as an interpretative standard for maintaining the protective purpose of existing safety law under conditions in which machine speed exceeds human reaction capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20837151
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incolla questo: Systemic Arrestability: Operator Protection in Machine Safety Law When Machine Speed Exceeds Human Reaction

Giovanni Nardacci
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Free Will and Agency
article

Incolla questo: Systemic Arrestability: Operator Protection in Machine Safety Law When Machine Speed Exceeds Human Reaction

Giovanni Nardacci
article en

Abstract

Machine safety law rests on a foundational principle: the protection of the operator. Across legal systems, safety regulations require that machines be designed and operated so that dangerous situations can be stopped before injury occurs. This paper argues that such protection rests on an implicit temporal assumption: that the operator retains a meaningful opportunity to perceive a developing hazard, evaluate it, and intervene before harm occurs. To address this gap, the paper introduces the concept of systemic arrestability: a system is systemically arrestable when its capacity to halt a hazardous action does not depend on a human operator perceiving, evaluating, and intervening within the time window of that action. Through a comparative analysis of the European, Swiss, and United States machine-safety frameworks, the paper proposes systemic arrestability as an interpretative standard for maintaining the protective purpose of existing safety law under conditions in which machine speed exceeds human reaction capacity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Flagler College (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.