Introducing Cross-impact Scenario Policy Analysis (CRISPA): building scenarios and policy mixes based on logical consistency

Uncertainty is a fundamental challenge for public decision-making in domains requiring long-term investments, such as transport. Scenario planning is increasingly used to explore a wide range of possible futures. Scenarios typically combine several uncertain contextual factors, each of which may develop in different ways. A key difficulty, however, is that the number of possible scenarios grows exponentially with each additional factor. Methods such as Cross-Impact Balance analysis (CIB) address this by reducing the scenario space to a manageable size through filtering based on internal consistency, without requiring extensive data or advanced modelling. To date, CIB has been applied primarily to scenarios composed of external (uncontrolled) factors. The question is how to combine external factors with internal factors (i.e. policy measures) within a single analytical framework, so as to identify policy mixes that are robust across multiple scenarios. To address this, we present Cross-Impact Scenario-Policy Analysis (CRISPA), a dependency-based extension of consistency-oriented scenario analysis. Rather than scoring interrelations as promoting or restrictive impacts, CRISPA models them as logical dependencies, enabling policy mixes and contextual uncertainties to be evaluated in terms of mutual compatibility and contradiction. With the example of a metro construction project in Brussels, Belgium, we demonstrate how CRISPA can be used to evaluate (1) the consistency of scenarios, (2) consistency of policy mixes, (3) fitness of policy mixes under a single scenario or their robustness across multiple scenarios. CRISPA integrates external uncertainties and policy measures in one framework CRISPA represents interrelations through logical dependencies rather than impacts The method identifies internally consistent scenarios and policy mixes It evaluates whether policy mixes are scenario-fit or robust across futures A Brussels metro case illustrates the method in a transport planning context

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Futures Research
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-026-00277-9
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing Cross-impact Scenario Policy Analysis (CRISPA): building scenarios and policy mixes based on logical consistency

Imre Keserü, Geert te Boveldt, Sara Tori
European Journal of Futures Research
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Introducing Cross-impact Scenario Policy Analysis (CRISPA): building scenarios and policy mixes based on logical consistency

Imre Keserü, Geert te Boveldt, Sara Tori
article en

Abstract

Uncertainty is a fundamental challenge for public decision-making in domains requiring long-term investments, such as transport. Scenario planning is increasingly used to explore a wide range of possible futures. Scenarios typically combine several uncertain contextual factors, each of which may develop in different ways. A key difficulty, however, is that the number of possible scenarios grows exponentially with each additional factor. Methods such as Cross-Impact Balance analysis (CIB) address this by reducing the scenario space to a manageable size through filtering based on internal consistency, without requiring extensive data or advanced modelling. To date, CIB has been applied primarily to scenarios composed of external (uncontrolled) factors. The question is how to combine external factors with internal factors (i.e. policy measures) within a single analytical framework, so as to identify policy mixes that are robust across multiple scenarios. To address this, we present Cross-Impact Scenario-Policy Analysis (CRISPA), a dependency-based extension of consistency-oriented scenario analysis. Rather than scoring interrelations as promoting or restrictive impacts, CRISPA models them as logical dependencies, enabling policy mixes and contextual uncertainties to be evaluated in terms of mutual compatibility and contradiction. With the example of a metro construction project in Brussels, Belgium, we demonstrate how CRISPA can be used to evaluate (1) the consistency of scenarios, (2) consistency of policy mixes, (3) fitness of policy mixes under a single scenario or their robustness across multiple scenarios. CRISPA integrates external uncertainties and policy measures in one framework CRISPA represents interrelations through logical dependencies rather than impacts The method identifies internally consistent scenarios and policy mixes It evaluates whether policy mixes are scenario-fit or robust across futures A Brussels metro case illustrates the method in a transport planning context

European Journal of Futures ResearchVol. 14(1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Innoviris
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.