Application of analytical quality by design (AQBD) and green chemistry principles for the development, optimization, and measurement uncertainty for quantification of genotoxic impurity in benzydamine hydrochloride

Abstract Impurity G, also known as 3-Chloro- N , N -dimethylpropan-1-amine, is a genotoxic impurity that may be present in benzydamine hydrochloride and can cause damage to genetic material, so its content must be estimated. Development of analytical methods for quantifying impurity G in benzydamine hydrochloride is a challenge, mainly because its control is at trace levels. This work applies the concepts of analytical quality by design (AQbD), measurement uncertainty, and the green chemistry approach to determine the content of impurity G in benzydamine hydrochloride using gas chromatography coupled to the flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and liquid–liquid extraction (LLE). Initially, screening was carried out using Plackett–Burman and followed by optimization with the central composite design (CCD). Response surface methodology was used to define the method operable design region, ensuring optimal performance and the definition of robust methods. Optimized conditions included a DB-624 chromatographic column (30 m × 0.53 mm × 3 µm), direct splitless injection, a flow rate of 8.5 mL/min, and helium as the carrier gas. Sample preparation used either n-heptane (4 µL) or ethyl acetate (3 µL) as the extraction solvent. The validated methods demonstrated selectivity, linearity (2.5–6.0 ppm), precision, and accuracy. The green metrics (AGREE tool) using ethyl acetate in sample preparation were greener (0.73) than n-heptane (0.67) and the Ph. Eur. method (0.45). To demonstrate applicability under real analytical conditions, three independent API batches were analyzed, yielding impurity levels of 0, 3, and 4 ppm, thereby confirming the method’s capability for reliable quantification at trace levels. Measurement uncertainties were also evaluated, showing acceptance limits (AL) for GC-FID procedures using n-heptane and ethyl acetate as extractors of 4.25 ppm (g = 0.75) and 4.75 ppm (g = 0.25), respectively

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-026-01711-y
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of analytical quality by design (AQBD) and green chemistry principles for the development, optimization, and measurement uncertainty for quantification of genotoxic impurity in benzydamine hydrochloride

Leandro Augusto Calixto, Felipe Rebello Lourenço, Giovanna Cristina Marcelino [UNIFESP] Diego
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Application of analytical quality by design (AQBD) and green chemistry principles for the development, optimization, and measurement uncertainty for quantification of genotoxic impurity in benzydamine hydrochloride

Leandro Augusto Calixto, Felipe Rebello Lourenço, Giovanna Cristina Marcelino [UNIFESP] Diego
article en

Abstract

Abstract Impurity G, also known as 3-Chloro- N , N -dimethylpropan-1-amine, is a genotoxic impurity that may be present in benzydamine hydrochloride and can cause damage to genetic material, so its content must be estimated. Development of analytical methods for quantifying impurity G in benzydamine hydrochloride is a challenge, mainly because its control is at trace levels. This work applies the concepts of analytical quality by design (AQbD), measurement uncertainty, and the green chemistry approach to determine the content of impurity G in benzydamine hydrochloride using gas chromatography coupled to the flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and liquid–liquid extraction (LLE). Initially, screening was carried out using Plackett–Burman and followed by optimization with the central composite design (CCD). Response surface methodology was used to define the method operable design region, ensuring optimal performance and the definition of robust methods. Optimized conditions included a DB-624 chromatographic column (30 m × 0.53 mm × 3 µm), direct splitless injection, a flow rate of 8.5 mL/min, and helium as the carrier gas. Sample preparation used either n-heptane (4 µL) or ethyl acetate (3 µL) as the extraction solvent. The validated methods demonstrated selectivity, linearity (2.5–6.0 ppm), precision, and accuracy. The green metrics (AGREE tool) using ethyl acetate in sample preparation were greener (0.73) than n-heptane (0.67) and the Ph. Eur. method (0.45). To demonstrate applicability under real analytical conditions, three independent API batches were analyzed, yielding impurity levels of 0, 3, and 4 ppm, thereby confirming the method’s capability for reliable quantification at trace levels. Measurement uncertainties were also evaluated, showing acceptance limits (AL) for GC-FID procedures using n-heptane and ethyl acetate as extractors of 4.25 ppm (g = 0.75) and 4.75 ppm (g = 0.25), respectively

Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Microsoft (Brazil) (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.